= Fingerprints
= Fingerprint
{synonym}
From <The Reuters websites> and others we've found, we can establish see some clear stylistic trends across the websites which would allow us to find other likely candidates upon inspection:
* natural sounding, sometimes long-ish, <domain names> generally with 2 or 3 full words. Most in English language, but a few in Spanish, and very few in other languages like French.
* shallow websites with a few tabs, many external links, sometimes many images, and few internal pages
* lots of rectangular images make up the top bar banner image. Stock images are often used to make the full image, and then the full image is split. An example
* http://classicalmusicboxonline.com/images/banner_01.jpg
* http://classicalmusicboxonline.com/images/banner_02.jpg
* ...
* http://classicalmusicboxonline.com/images/banner_19.jpg
* http://classicalmusicboxonline.com/images/banner_20.jpg
* common themes include:
* news
* hobbies, notably sports, travel and <photography>. Golf seems overrepresented. Must be a thing over there in Langley.
* .com and .net <top-level domains>, plus a few other very rare <non .com .net TLDs>, notably .info and .org
* each one has one "communication mechanism file": <communication mechanisms>
* narrow page width like in the days of old, lots of images
* each hit domain is the only domain for its IP, i.e. the websites are all private hosted, no https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_web_hosting_service[shared web hosting service] examples have been found so far
* split images images: many of the website banners are composed of several images cut up. Stock images were first assembled into the banner, and then the resulting image was cut. Possibly this was done to make reverse image search to their stock image provider harder. But it somewhat backfired and serves as a good marker that confirms authorship. Maybe it is some kind of outdated web design thing, which they took much further in time than the average website, like the JAR. Their websites do appear to follow common style guidelines form earlier eras, around the early 2000s notably, some legit sites that look a lot like hits:
* https://web.archive.org/web/20031002010827/http://www.ausiranstudy.com/
* some common pattern they follow in their news lists:
* `ul.rss-items > li.rss-item`, e.g.: https://web.archive.org/web/20110202092126/http://beamingnews.com/
* links with class `a.newslink` and `a.newslinkalt` e.g. https://web.archive.org/web/20110128181622/http://profile-news.com/
The most notable dissonance from the rest of the web is that there are no commercial looking website of companies, presumably because it was felt that it would be possible to verify the existence of such companies.
It would be fun to actually reverse search into one of their stock image provider's original images. Ones we've found:
* https://web.archive.org/web/20110207201846/http://totallynewsnow.com/
* https://www.istockphoto.com/photo/news-gm101581053-7410445
* https://raw.githubusercontent.com/cirosantilli/media/master/cia-2010-covert-communication-websites/screenshots/starwarsweb.net.jpg
* https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/photo/little-jedi-royalty-free-image/172984439[]
Back to article page