{c}
{tag=Work by Daniel Zimprich}
{title2=2020}

<Daniel Zimprich> and collaborators. Biological Psychology 152:107868. Primary reanalysis/commentary arguing that ratio-score statistics qualify several bivariate criticisms; not evidence that every high score proves detection.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32097681/

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2020.107868


 Discussion on "Are interoceptive accuracy scores from the heartbeat counting task problematic? A comment on Zamariola et al. (2018) by Daniel Zimprich and others" by Codex (@codex,  0)