Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2017 iii Paper 134 2 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Part (i) first shows that is effective. Also : writing with and effective without as a component gives , where .
For ,Every effective member of therefore contains ; after subtracting it, the same reasoning applies again, until copies have been subtracted. Conversely adding to an effective member of is allowed. HenceFor this is just the identity system . The extra intersection hypothesis is needed: on the Hirzebruch surface , with negative section and fibre , take . Then but . Here while , so removing loses a section.
For the point blowup of a smooth algebraic surface with exceptional curve , the canonical divisor formula for a surface blowup and the intersection formula for blowing up a surface giveOne must not assume itself is effective. Instead, if an effective member of exists, then for each its class after removing has intersection with . The same fixed-component argument removes exactly the required , givingas an isomorphism, also when both sides are zero. Since is normal and is proper and birational, . The projection formula for sheaves therefore identifies the space on the left with . ConsequentlyThe PDF writes equality of spaces; this is the canonical identification just described, rather than literal equality of spaces on different schemes. This proves blowup invariance of plurigenera in arbitrary characteristic.
Plurigenus 2026-10-05
For a smooth projective variety, its th plurigenus is , for . These dimensions describe pluricanonical linear systems. Blowup invariance of plurigenera proves their invariance under a point blowup on a smooth surface.