For , let be its category of elements. Its objects are with ; an arrow is a morphism satisfying . This is a small category, because is small and all values of are sets.
Send to the representable presheaf , and send an arrow to postcomposition . There is a cocone to whose map at is
The functor laws give its naturality and the required cocone compatibility.
Compute the colimit pointwise as a disjoint union modulo its diagram identifications. At a representative is a triple , and it maps to . Every is the image of . Moreover is an arrow in , so its diagram relation identifies
Thus every representative is identified with the canonical representative of its image. Two representatives have equal images exactly when their canonical representatives agree. This proves a componentwise bijection; restriction maps respect it. The resulting natural isomorphism is the canonical colimit presentation of a presheaf:
The category of elements of has objects with and morphisms satisfying . Send to the representable presheaf and a morphism to . The Yoneda lemma gives a canonical cocone to , whose leg at corresponds to .
For any target presheaf , a cocone from this diagram to is a family of maps , or equivalently elements , with whenever . Such a family is exactly a natural transformation , via . This bijection respects the canonical cocone, so it proves its colimit universal property. Consequently the canonical colimit presentation of a presheaf is
Equivalently, the density coend identifies the disjoint copies of the representables by exactly these element-category arrows. Smallness of and the set-valued fibers make the indexing category small.
Write . The category of elements of a categorical presheaf has objects with ; a morphism is satisfying . It is a small category because is small and each is a set. Consider the diagram sending to and to the natural transformation given by postcomposition with .
There is a canonical cocone with
Functoriality makes it a natural transformation, and the equation makes these transformations a cocone.
To prove its universal property, let be any categorical presheaf with a compatible cocone . Define
For and , compatibility with the arrow gives
Thus is natural. Naturality of each shows . Conversely any transformation with these equations must have the displayed values , so it is unique. We have proved the canonical colimit presentation of a presheaf:
By the canonical colimit presentation of a presheaf, write
with structure maps . Since is a 0-presentable object, the canonical map
is bijective. Every element of a set-valued colimit has a representative in some component. In particular is the image of a transformation for some , so
Thus is a retract of . The representable retract criterion from part (c), using the assumed equalisers in , now gives is representable. Only existence of the representative of is needed; no stronger uniqueness-of-factorization assertion about individual colimit injections has been assumed.
Small projective object 2026-10-14
An object with the displayed property is called small projective; the term 0-presentable here uses this all-small-colimits convention. In a presheaf category, every representable presheaf has this property by the Yoneda lemma and pointwise computation of colimits. Conversely the canonical colimit presentation of a presheaf shows that the identity on such an object factors through one representable, making it a retract. If the indexing category has equalizers, a representable retract is again representable by the representable retract criterion.