The conservation of mass equation is . The flat region changes on time scale , whereas a transition has advection time . Hence , and its flux change across the transition is , small compared with the entering flux . To leading order the transition is quasisteady and
Eliminate in the longitudinal equation. Then , so
Use , with , and use a prime for differentiation with respect to . This gives the third-order equation
Here remains a dimensional thickness; only the longitudinal coordinate is scaled.
Match at the inner end to , , . Since , the first integral is
Divide by to obtain . Its second integral, using the flat-film limit to fix the constant, is
Let . In the overlap , the equation gives , hence . The curvature of each physical interface is . Matching to the outer bubble curvature therefore requires and fixes the numerical coefficient:
Finally the uniform-film evolution becomes . If at the start of the drainage regime, its solution is
Thus capillary drainage of a film between two bubbles gives an algebraic decrease, and the two bubbles do not touch in finite time in this ideal model. As decreases, and become still smaller, so the geometric scale separation improves. At molecular thicknesses, disjoining pressure and changes in the assumed stress-free boundary condition can invalidate the clean continuum-sheet description; the algebraic law alone makes no claim about that physical endpoint.
In the short end transition, the full thickness changes by while the curvature of each interface changes to . Since each interface has height , the curvature scale is , with order-one factors irrelevant to this estimate. Therefore
This is the geometric scale of the capillary drainage of a film between two bubbles. The assumed regime additionally requires and , so the transition is long compared with its thickness and short compared with the flat sheet length.