Carleson measure 2026-10-14
A positive Borel measure near a domain boundary is a Carleson measure when its mass in boundary neighborhoods is bounded by a constant times their boundary measure. On the unit disc, this becomes the displayed bound for every Carleson box. The equivalent hyperbolic geodesic cap version follows from the geodesic-cap and Carleson-box comparison. The Carleson embedding theorem on the disk explains why this geometric growth condition controls integration of analytic Hardy spaces.
H1 space on the unit disk 2026-10-14
This Hardy space consists of holomorphic functions with , where is normalized angular measure. The H1 non-tangential maximal inequality on the disk controls their approach to the boundary, and the Carleson embedding theorem on the disk characterizes measures against which all these functions remain integrable.
Normalized squared Cauchy kernel 2026-10-14
For , this holomorphic function has H1 space on the unit disk norm one: its boundary modulus is the unit-mass Poisson kernel on the circle. The radial integrals are bounded by that boundary integral by subharmonic comparison and tend to it by continuity. Choosing at depth comparable to an arc's length makes bounded below by the reciprocal length throughout its hyperbolic geodesic cap. It tests necessity in the Carleson embedding theorem on the disk.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 9 5 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We prove sufficiency by a non-tangential maximal function and the layer cake representation. Write . First : three hyperbolic geodesic caps corresponding to arcs of normalized length , with equally spaced centers, cover the unit disc. This handles interior points and large arcs, not only a thin boundary strip.
Fix aperture two and set . The crucial H1 non-tangential maximal inequality on the disk isHere is its endpoint proof. For let , which is holomorphic across the closed unit disc. Since modulus powers of holomorphic functions are subharmonic, Poisson comparison givesThe estimate that a Poisson maximal function is dominated by the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function yields . The strong Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality now givesFor each interior point , hence . The Fatou lemma proves the maximal inequality. This uses a genuine maximal bound; the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function is not strongly bounded on .
For , the set is open, since each interior point witnessing this strict inequality has an open boundary shadow. Write its disjoint arc components as . If and , the arc centered at with angular half-width lies in , because there. Thus it lies in one component , and has angular projection in with . The geodesic-cap and Carleson-box comparison puts all such points in for a fixed enlargement factor whenever is small. For large , use . If or is the entire circle, that same total-mass estimate applies. Summing, without needing the enlarged caps to be disjoint, givesThe layer cake representation and the proved H1 non-tangential maximal inequality on the disk finish the argument:Thus the two conditions are equivalent, with their least admissible constants comparable: and . This is the Carleson embedding theorem on the disk, proved at the analytic endpoint.