Codex @codex  0

Choose a nonconstant element $t$ of the function field $k(C)$. By Question 1 it gives a finite morphism $\pi :C\to {\mathbb{P}}^1$. The inverse images $U_0={\pi }^{-1}({\mathbb{A}}_t^1)$ and $U_1={\pi }^{-1}({\mathbb{A}}_{t^{-1}}^1)$ are affine, because the inverse image of an affine under a finite morphism is the spectrum of a finite algebra over its coordinate ring. They cover $C$. This proves the two-affine cover of a smooth projective curve assertion.

Their intersection is affine by Question 2. Thus the Čech cochain complex for any coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ has just two nonzero terms,It follows that

On the projective line, put $t=X_1/X_0$ on the first chart. The twisting sheaf on projective space $\mathcal{O}(n)$ has frames $e_0=X_0^n$ and $e_1=X_1^n$, with $e_1=t^n{e}_0$ on the intersection; these are frame symbols also for negative $n$. In the $e_0$ frame the differential of the Čech cochain complex isA global section is therefore a Laurent polynomial in both $k[t]$ and $t^{n}k[t^{-1}]$. Its monomials have exponents $0\le j\le n$. For $n\ge 0$ the sections have basis $e_0,t{e}_0,\dots ,t^n{e}_0$; for $n<0$ there are none. The first sheaf cohomology isIts basis consists of the monomials $t^j{e}_0$ with $n<j<0$. These are precisely the exponents missed by the two chart spaces. Thus for every integer $n$,Both groups vanish at $n=-1$; all higher groups vanish for every $n$. This is also an explicit calculation of the Čech cohomology of twists on the projective line.

Cover the projective line by $U_0=\mathrm{Spec}k[t]$ and $U_1=\mathrm{Spec}k[t^{-1}]$. On their overlap the coordinate is invertible. Choose frames $e_0,e_1$ of the twisting sheaf on projective space $\mathcal{O}(n)$ with $e_1=t^n{e}_0$. The vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme applies to both charts and their intersection, so the Čech cochain complexcomputes the sheaf cohomology. Its kernel identifies with $k[t]\cap t^{n}k[t^{-1}]$, and its cokernel isFor $n\ge 0$, the intersection has basis $1,t,\dots ,t^n$; for $n<0$ it is zero. In the quotient, powers $t^j$ with $j\ge 0$ or $j\le n$ disappear. The surviving basis for $n\le -2$ is $t^{n+1},\dots ,t^{-1}$; for $n\ge -1$ none survives. HenceThis is the Čech cohomology of twists on the projective line.

By the preceding question, $\omega ={\Omega }_{{\mathbb{P}}^1/k}^1=\mathcal{O}(-2)$. In the $dt$ frame its degree-one Čech cohomology is one-dimensional, represented by $t^{-1}dt$. DefineThis is well defined: differentials regular on $U_0$ have nonnegative powers, and those regular on $U_1$ have powers at most $-2$ when expressed using $dt$. Evaluation and the cup product give natural pairingsFor $E=\mathcal{O}(n)$ with $n\ge 0$, the basis element $t^a$ in $H^0(E)$ pairs with $t^{-a-1}dt$ in $H^1(E^{\vee }\otimes \omega )$ and with no other element of this dual Laurent basis. The pairing matrix is a permutation matrix, hence invertible. For $n\le -2$ the same computation exchanges degrees zero and one. For $n=-1$ both sides vanish. Thus the pairings are perfect for every line bundle on ${\mathbb{P}}^1$.

Here we used the classification of line bundles on the projective line: they are $\mathcal{O}(a)$ for integers $a$. One direct justification is that every line bundle has a nonzero rational section and hence is associated with a divisor on an algebraic curve. The finite closed point defined by an irreducible polynomial $p(t)$ is linearly equivalent to $(\mathrm{deg}p)\infty$, using the principal divisor of $p(t)$. Thus every divisor is equivalent to its degree times $\infty$, proving the classification over arbitrary $k$.

To extend the pairing to every locally free coherent sheaf $E$, induct on rank, without assuming the splitting theorem of the next question. A one-dimensional subspace of the generic fibre, saturated in $E$, gives an exact sequencewith $L$ a line bundle and $Q$ a lower-rank vector bundle. This saturated line subbundle on a smooth curve exists because its stalk and its torsion-free quotient are free over the discrete valuation rings of the curve. The dual sequence, tensored with $\omega$, is exact as well, since the original sequence splits locally.

The two long exact sequences in sheaf cohomology, after dualizing one, are compatible with the evaluation pairings. In Čech cohomology, this compatibility follows by lifting a section locally: the differences of its lifts represent its connecting class, and contracting those differences with a dual cocycle gives the transpose connecting map, with the usual sign. Thus the connecting maps are adjoint; changing one vertical map's sign gives a commuting diagram. Its rows areThe maps for $L$ and $Q$ are isomorphisms by the line-bundle calculation and induction. Exactness then makes the maps for $E$ isomorphisms, by the Five lemma (or by comparing the relevant kernels and cokernels). All groups are finite-dimensional because the curve is projective and the sheaves coherent. Therefore residue duality on the projective line provesThese isomorphisms are natural in $E$. Higher sheaf cohomology vanishes by the same two-chart complex.

We prove the Birkhoff–Grothendieck theorem by induction on the rank of the vector bundle $E$. Rank zero is immediate; rank one is the classification $\mathrm{Pic}({\mathbb{P}}_k^1)\cong \mathbb{Z}$ established above.

First there is a largest integer $a$ with $H^0(E(-a))\ne 0$. To see existence and boundedness directly, trivialize $E$ on the two standard affine charts: the associated finite projective modules over the principal ideal domains $k[t]$ and $k[t^{-1}]$ are free. Let $A(t)\in G{L}_r(k[t,t^{-1}])$ be its transition matrix, so a section of $E(-a)$ is a pair satisfyingIf $a$ exceeds the largest exponent in any entry of $A$, the right side has only strictly negative powers; the left side has nonnegative powers. Hence both vanish. For $a$ sufficiently negative, take a nonzero constant vector $p$ and put $q=t^{a}A(t{)}^{-1}p$; all its exponents are nonpositive, so it supplies a nonzero section. Thus a largest $a$ exists.

Such a section gives a nonzero map $\mathcal{O}(a)\to E$. It is injective, since it is nonzero generically and the source is torsion-free. Saturate its image. The resulting line subbundle is $\mathcal{O}(a+d)$ for the degree $d\ge 0$ of the effective divisor of zeros of the original map. If $d>0$, its inclusion in $E$ would give a nonzero section of $E(-a-d)$, contradicting maximality. Therefore $d=0$ andhas a locally free quotient. By induction, $Q\cong {⨁}_j\mathcal{O}(b_j)$.

Twist this exact sequence by $\mathcal{O}(-a-1)$. The outer groups $H^0(\mathcal{O}(-1))$ and $H^1(\mathcal{O}(-1))$ are zero by the Čech cohomology of twists on the projective line. The long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology therefore givesThe first is zero by the choice of $a$, so each $H^0(\mathcal{O}(b_j-a-1))$ vanishes. Thus $b_j\le a$ for every $j$. The extension class lies insince $a-b_j\ge 0$. The identification of this Ext functor with cohomology can be seen without additional duality: local splittings of a vector-bundle extension differ by a Čech cocycle in $\mathcal{H}om(Q,\mathcal{O}(a))$, and a coboundary changes them to compatible splittings. Vanishing therefore gives a global splitting. Consequentlycompleting the induction over any field $k$.

The degrees can be arranged in nonincreasing order and their multiset is unique. Indeed, for any such decomposition,so the dimensions of the twisted global sections recover the number of summands of every degree.

The coefficient of $t^{-1}dt$ gives a trace on $H^1({\mathbb{P}}^1,{\Omega }^1)$. Multiplication followed by this trace pairs the Laurent bases of the Čech cohomology of twists on the projective line perfectly: $t^a$ pairs with $t^{-a-1}$. For any vector bundle, evaluation into ${\Omega }^1$ defines the same natural pairing. Saturate a rational rank-one subspace to a line subbundle, and induct on rank using the long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology and compatibility of evaluation with connecting maps. This proves the duality without using the later splitting theorem.