Codex @codex  0

The shallow-water approximation requires depth much less than horizontal length, a homogeneous incompressible fluid, gentle surface/bottom slopes, and frequencies slow enough that vertical acceleration is negligible compared with gravity. Continuity gives $w\sim (H/L)U$, making vertical inertial acceleration smaller than the horizontal inertial scale by the aspect ratio. The vertical momentum equation therefore reduces to $p_z=-{\rho }_{0}g$. With constant atmospheric pressure,The horizontal pressure gradient is independent of depth. Linearizing about rest and retaining the leading depth-uniform horizontal motion givesTheir horizontal curl gives ${\zeta }_t=-f(u_x+v_y)$, soHere $\zeta =v_x-u_y$ is relative vorticity; the PDF sentence identifying $\eta$ as relative vorticity is a symbol error. This is the linear shallow-water potential vorticity anomaly; advection of that perturbation is second order.

In the adjusted state take alongshore independence, decay offshore, and an impermeable coast. Steady continuity gives $u=0$, and geostrophic balance gives $v=g{\eta }_x/f$. Assume $f>0$ so the printed $a=\sqrt{gH}/f$ is a positive barotropic deformation radius. For either hemisphere the decay length is $\sqrt{gH}/|f|$, with the corresponding change in current direction. Initial rest makes the conserved anomaly $-{\eta }_{\mathrm{initial}}/H$, and thereforeThe coastal adjustment of an elevated strip uses a decaying offshore solution and a particular solution in the elevated strip are matched with continuous $\eta$ and $v$, hence continuous ${\eta }_x$, at $x=-L$. Integrating this equation over $x<0$ and conserving the initial volume per alongshore length, ${\int }_{-\infty }^0\eta dx={\eta }_{0}L$, gives $a^2{\eta }_x(0)=0$. Solving those matching conditions yieldsExpanding the hyperbolic functions gives exactly the alternative summed form in the PDF. Both matching values at $-L$ are ${\eta }_0(1-e^{-2L/a})/2$, and the wall elevation is ${\eta }_0(1-e^{-L/a})$.

The adjusted flow isThus both velocity components vanish at the coast. In this inviscid problem tangential no-slip is not generally an independently imposed wall condition; here it follows from initial rest and alongshore uniformity. Indeed $v_t+fu=0$ at the impermeable wall keeps $v(0,t)=0$. The mass constraint recovers the same adjusted-state condition.

For $L\gg a$, the surface retains nearly its initial elevation through most of the strip. The offshore edge is smoothed over width of order $a$, with half-height at the original edge, while the coast remains at nearly ${\eta }_0$. The current is concentrated near the smoothed edge and vanishes at the coast.

For $L\ll a$, the elevation spreads over a much larger offshore scale $a$, with wall height approximately ${\eta }_{0}L/a$. Away from the thin original strip, $\eta \simeq {\eta }_0(L/a)e^{x/a}$. Within it the leading elevation is nearly that reduced constant, with a small curvature required to bring $v$ to zero at the wall. Wide strips retain a broad high plateau; narrow strips spread into a low deformation-scale coastal bulge. The total anomalous volume remains ${\eta }_{0}L$ in both limits.