= Cytotoxicity
\b[Cytotoxicity] is the capacity of an exposure or agent to damage or kill <biological cells>. Its measurement depends on the cell type, exposure conditions, observation time and endpoint. A test of <cell viability>, membrane damage or metabolic activity records a particular response; it does not by itself identify every mechanism of injury or establish overall <biocompatibility>.
A motivating experiment is <T. Mosmann>'s 1983 <tetrazolium salt> colorimetric assay. Living mammalian cells produced a measurable signal read with a multiwell scanning <spectrophotometer>. The primary paper explicitly notes that the signal depends on cellular activation, permitting studies of survival, proliferation and activation.<Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays by T. Mosmann>[Abstract, living-cell signal, activation dependence and multiwell readout]{ref}
For an original blank-corrected comparison, suppose the treated culture gives <absorbance> $A_t=0.45$, the matched control $A_c=0.85$ and the reagent blank $A_b=0.05$. The relative assay signal is
$$
V=\frac{A_t-A_b}{A_c-A_b}=\frac{0.40}{0.80}=0.50.
$$
Calling this a relative signal states exactly what was calculated. It does not establish that half the cells died. In a linear response model $A-A_b=qN$, either halving viable-cell number $N$ at fixed per-cell response $q$, or halving $q$ with no change in $N$, produces the same result.
A useful experiment therefore compares complementary endpoints and controls for the exposure vehicle, reagent background and direct optical interference. A material-only blank can reveal color or light scattering from the tested substance itself. Independent cell counts or a membrane-integrity measurement address different ambiguities from repeated readings of the same optical signal. Reduced proliferation and cell death should be distinguished when interpreting an apparent cytotoxic response.
Back to article page