In a small regular category , the regular coverage has one-arrow covers: each regular epimorphism is a covering family by itself. Identity maps, composites and pullbacks of such arrows are again covers, so this is a basis for a Grothendieck topology. A presheaf is a sheaf precisely when every compatible section over a covering arrow descends uniquely along that arrow.
It is subcanonical. A section of the representable presheaf over is a map . Its matching condition is on the kernel pair . Since a regular epimorphism is the coequalizer of its kernel pair, there is a unique with . This is exactly the sheaf condition for .
For a subfunctor of a regular-coverage sheaf, define local membership by
This is a subfunctor. If and witnesses membership, pull back along ; the resulting cover of witnesses membership of , because is stable under restriction.
It is a sheaf as well. Let cover and let satisfy the kernel-pair matching condition. The sheaf gives a unique with . Choose a cover with . The composite is a cover of and witnesses . Uniqueness comes from . Thus the inclusion is a mono between sheaves and is closed for the associated local operator.
Moreover, any closed subobject containing is itself a sheaf. If , its restriction along a witnessing cover lies in , and the sheaf condition for descends it to a section in . Its image in is by uniqueness. Hence is the least closed subobject containing , and
This proves the local membership closure for the regular coverage, with a single regular epimorphism as witness.
Suppose is the union, in the sheaf topos, of a family of subsheaves . The union in presheaves is the pointwise union ; its closure is the union in sheaves. Thus . A witnessing cover belongs to for one index . The two restrictions of to its kernel pair agree. Since is a subsheaf, this matching section descends in to . Every map is the restriction of along , so . Therefore every representable sheaf is irreducible, even with respect to arbitrary unions. There are no empty covering families in this coverage, and also shows that the representable cannot be initial.
Finally, in the regular syntactic category of a regular theory, the context formula defines an object . Each formula defines a mono , and the associated representable subsheaf is its interpretation inside in the generic model. A derivation of the coherent disjunction says that these finitely many subsheaves have union . Irreducibility gives for some . The Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, since the coverage is subcanonical, and therefore reflects this isomorphism. Hence is invertible in the syntactic category: entails . Thus
The disjunction is an outer coherent conclusion; the theory and all constituent formulas are regular. This disjunction property of regular theories follows from single-arrow descent, rather than from ordinary first-order compactness.
Regular theory 2026-10-07
A regular theory has axioms that are sequents between regular formulas. It has a regular syntactic category and a classifying topos of sheaves for the regular coverage. Its regular formulas enjoy the disjunction property of regular theories when a finite disjunction is allowed as an outer coherent conclusion.