The strict statement as printed needs the qualification if . Part (a) already shows in the present situation, and the next part proves ; an unconditional would contradict that conclusion.
To prove the needed conditional statement, suppose . A fixed part has . Indeed, a different has smaller multiplicity along some component of ; otherwise would be a nonzero effective linearly trivial divisor. Adding a member of the movable part avoiding that component contradicts fixedness.
The Hodge index theorem for algebraic surfaces, together with and , gives . If equality held, Riemann–Roch theorem for algebraic surfaces would give , and Serre duality would give . Hence , a contradiction. Therefore
This is the fixed-part elimination on a K3 surface argument.
The intersection calculation in part (vi)(a) gives . Part (vi)(b), with its necessary qualification, excludes every nonzero fixed part. Thus and is movable. Part (v) gives , and by hypothesis. Applying part (ii) proves
Thus a nontrivial nef divisor of square zero on a K3 surface defines a fibration over a curve; the key step is fixed-part elimination on a K3 surface.