Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 137 2 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The original PDF has the summation condition ; the TeX's is a transcription error. There is also an actual missing hypothesis in the PDF's coefficient formula: that simplified formula requires a primitive Dirichlet character. We first derive a formula valid for every character, and then show both the primitive specialization and a counterexample to the unrestricted version.
For , the character-twisted Eisenstein series converges absolutely and locally uniformly on the complex upper half-plane. On a compact subset, is bounded below by a positive constant times , and the corresponding two-dimensional lattice sum converges. Changing to provesThe condition makes the terms for and equal. The terms with contribute , and all other terms are twice the sum over .
For , the cotangent identity andgive, after differentiations,Differentiation is justified by locally uniform convergence. This is the cotangent partial-fraction Fourier kernel.
Write , with running through the unit classes modulo , and define the finite Fourier transformHere is the Gauss sum of a Dirichlet character.
Applying the kernel with yieldsThe double series converges absolutely: and the exponential decay controls . Grouping the terms with proves the general Fourier expansion of a character-twisted Eisenstein series:
Applying the kernel with yieldsThe double series converges absolutely: and the exponential decay controls . Grouping the terms with proves the general Fourier expansion of a character-twisted Eisenstein series:
If is a unit modulo , substitution gives . Suppose now that is primitive and is a nonunit. Choose a prime . Reduction of units modulo onto units modulo is surjective. Primitivity means that is nontrivial on its kernel, so there is a unit with . Since , substitution by forces and thus . This proves the finite Fourier transform of a primitive Dirichlet character identity, and consequentlyThe inverse-character notation in the question is understood to mean , extended by zero on nonunits; literal inversion of would be undefined.
For a counterexample without primitivity, take , the principal character, and . Then , so but . At , the general formula gives , whereas the printed simplified formula, interpreted as zero on nonunits, gives . Hence the printed coefficient formula is false for arbitrary imprimitive characters; the general boxed formula above supplies the correction.