Frank Fenner 2026-11-05
Frank Fenner was a researcher of viruses whose work also helped establish that smallpox had been eradicated worldwide. He chaired the international commission responsible for certification and presented its conclusion to the World Health Assembly in May 1980. In his firsthand interview, he describes certification as an evidential problem distinct from conducting the campaign itself.[ref]
Professor Frank Fenner, microbiologist and virologist in Conversations with Australian scientists. Sections Smallpox: certifying eradication and Taxonomy of viruses.
The distinction is scientifically useful: recording no recent cases in one place is different from establishing worldwide interruption of transmission. Certification requires examining the coverage and credibility of the observations, not merely counting successful interventions. Fenner also helped assemble a detailed historical account of the campaign, linking epidemiology, vaccination and evidence from different countries. His contribution illustrates how public-health science depends both on changing outcomes and on documenting why a conclusion is justified.[ref]
Professor Frank Fenner, microbiologist and virologist in Conversations with Australian scientists. Scientific writings: account of preparing the eradication history and its country-by-country coverage.
Jacques Miller 2026-11-05
Jacques Miller established a central role of the thymus in the development of immunity. In his firsthand account, removing the thymus from newborn mice led to a deficiency of lymphocytes and failure to reject skin grafts. The contrast with removal in adult mice helped reveal a developmental function that adult experiments had obscured.[ref]
Professor Jacques Miller, pathologist in Conversations with Australian scientists. Why did the mice waste away? An unexpected finding: lymphocyte deficiency, graft acceptance and the 1961 report.
A further comparison separated two consequences of the intervention. In conditions excluding environmental microorganisms, the mice remained healthy but still failed to reject skin grafts. Thus wasting illness and impaired immune responses were not interchangeable observations: illness depended on exposure, while the graft test still revealed the immune defect. Miller's experiments helped replace the idea of the thymus as a largely inactive organ with a developmental explanation for immunological competence.[ref]
Professor Jacques Miller, pathologist in Conversations with Australian scientists. So why did the mice waste away?: germ-free comparison.

