Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2025 iii Paper 119 2 Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
For with , the unit and counit of an adjunction areobtained by transposing identity morphisms. They satisfy the triangular identities and .
If is full and faithful, fullness gives a map with ; the second triangular identity and faithfulness show that is inverse to . Conversely, if is an isomorphism, then for the unique arrow whose transpose is iswhich proves that is full, and the triangular identities prove faithfulness. Hence (i) and (ii) are equivalent. Condition (ii) immediately gives (iii). Conversely, a natural isomorphism combines with the adjunction bijection to show naturally that is bijective; by naturality and the triangular identities this is the map induced by up to invertible natural conjugation, so is full and faithful. Thus all three conditions are equivalent.
Suppose . If is full and faithful, the unit is an isomorphism. For in the codomain of , the two adjunctions then give natural bijectionsBy the Yoneda lemma, the counit is an isomorphism, so the fully faithful adjoint criterion makes full and faithful. The converse is dual.
Now assume is full and faithful. For , its counit is invertible; for , its unit is invertible. DefineApplying , then using naturality and the triangular identities, reduces this composite to the same map asSince is faithful, the two displayed composites are equal.
For a morphism , let be its transpose under . The identities just proved giveIf every is monic and , this equation gives , hence ; thus is faithful on arrows whose domains are in the image of . Conversely, if for , naturality of and the second formula for giveBoth maps have domain , so the assumed faithfulness gives . These are the transposes of and , hence . Therefore is pointwise monic exactly under the stated faithfulness condition.