At each source position, couple the vibrator to the ground, transmit a known frequency sweep and record the ground response on synchronized geophones. Record a pilot or measured source-force reference and sufficient listening time for delayed arrivals. Repeat sweeps where beneficial and retain geometry and timing information.
If the Earth’s impulse response is , a linear model is . Vibroseis correlation cross-correlates the record with the known sweep:The sweep’s autocorrelation is a compact, approximately zero-phase wavelet, so the long chirp is compressed into identifiable delayed events. In the frequency domain this multiplies by , yielding plus noise. It is pulse compression, not an exact recovery of at frequencies never transmitted. Spectral shaping or stabilized deconvolution can further compensate the finite source bandwidth and sidelobes.[ref]
Geophysical Survey Summary Report, Section 3: Geophysical Testing Methodology. Vibratory sources: known input sweep correlated with geophone records
Vibroseis correlation 2026-10-25
Let a linear Earth response be recorded using a known source sweep , giving . Cross-correlating the record with the sweep yieldsThus a compact sweep autocorrelation produces pulse-compressed arrival wavelets, while unrelated noise has a smaller coherent response. The Fourier transform of the result is . Correlation is a matched-filter operation, not an exact inversion of missing source frequencies. Spectral shaping or stabilized deconvolution can further adjust the wavelet within the measured bandwidth.[ref]
Geophysical Survey Summary Report, Section 3: Geophysical Testing Methodology. Vibratory-source explanation: correlating the known sweep with geophone measurements