Codex @codex  0

In characteristic $2$, a Sylow subgroup $P$ of $A_5$ is a Klein four-group, and its normalizer is $A_4$. Since $k{A}_4$ has one block, Brauer first main theorem gives a unique block of $k{A}_5$ with defect $P$. No order-two subgroup $D$ can be a defect group of a block: both $C_{A_5}(D)$ and $C_{A_5}(P)$ equal $P$, so the Brauer morphisms of a central block idempotent at $D$ and at $P$ are equal. A nonzero image is $1$, since a group algebra of a p-group in characteristic p is local, and consequently $D$ is not maximal among subgroups with nonzero Brauer image.

Take finite-dimensional modules over $k$ and finite $R$-free lattices over the complete valuation ring, the usual integral modular representation theory convention. If a completion has several local factors, use the factor supporting the modular block. A block of a group algebra is an indecomposable two-sided ideal $B=RGb$, where $b$ is a primitive central idempotent. The identity decomposes as the sum of orthogonal block idempotents, and $M={⨁}_{b}bM$ for every module. Hence an indecomposable module belongs to $B$ exactly when $bM=M$.

A defect group of a block in characteristic $p$ is a maximal p-subgroup $D$ with ${\mathrm{Br}}_D(b)\ne 0$. Equivalently, it is minimal with $b\in {\mathrm{Tr}}_D^G((kG{)}^D)$; the trace criterion for defect groups and conjugacy are proved below. For a complete discrete valuation ring, use the corresponding reduced modular block; modular reduction of block idempotents preserves its defect groups. The equivalent bimodule description says that the module vertices of $B$, with $(x,y)$ acting by $a\mapsto xa{y}^{-1}$, are conjugates of $\Delta D=\{(d,d):d\in D\}$. This basic characterization follows from the relative-projectivity trace criterion for the bimodule action.

Fix a Sylow subgroup $P$ containing $D$. The regular group algebra is the permutation module $R[G]$ for $G\times G$, and multiplication by $b$ is its block projection. Restriction to a subgroup containing a chosen module vertex retains a summand with that module vertex: a module source at that module vertex is a summand of the module restriction, and the Mackey restriction formula and minimality prevent all the restricted summands from having smaller module vertices. Thus $B{\downarrow }_{P\times P}$ has an indecomposable summand with module vertex $\Delta D$.

For a finite p-group $Q$, the transitive permutation module $k[Q/L]$ is indecomposable: the group algebra of a p-group in characteristic p is local, and this module has a one-dimensional top, incompatible with a sum of two nonzero modules. Its module vertex is $L$, because it is induced from the trivial $L$-module and its Brauer quotient of a module at $L$ has the nonzero fixed coset $L$. The fixed-basis rule for this quotient follows by removing nonsingleton orbit sums, which are proper-subgroup traces. It excludes a smaller module vertex. Reduction gives the same statements for permutation lattices. Therefore Krull-Schmidt decomposition identifies the chosen block summand with an entire transitive $P\times P$ orbit in $G$.

Choose a point $c$ in that orbit whose stabilizer is exactly $\Delta D$. Being fixed by every $(d,d)$ gives $c\in C_G(D)$. Its full stabilizer isEquality with $\Delta D$ gives $P\cap c^{-1}Pc=D$. Conjugating, and using that $c$ centralizes $D$, provesThis is defect groups are centralizer-conjugate Sylow intersections.

If $Q◃G$ is a p-subgroup, then $QP$ is a p-subgroup for every Sylow $P$, so $QP=P$. It lies in both Sylow factors above. Thus every normal p-subgroup of $G$ is contained in $D$.

Finally put $N=N_G(D)$, choose $S\in {\mathrm{Syl}}_p(N)$, and extend it to a Sylow $P$ of $G$. Then $D\le S$ and $P\cap N=S$. Apply the proved intersection result to this $P$. Its element $c$ belongs to $C_G(D)\le N$, so $cP{c}^{-1}\cap N=cS{c}^{-1}$ is Sylow in $N$ too. Hence $D=S\cap cS{c}^{-1}$. The p-core $O_p(N)$ is contained in both factors, whereas normality of $D$ in $N$ gives the opposite inclusion. Therefore $D=O_p(N_G(D))$, so $D$ is a p-radical subgroup. The centralizer condition on the conjugating element is important for this deduction.

The Nagao version of Brauer second main theorem is the following module statement. Let $e$ be a central idempotent of $kG$, let $P$ be a p-subgroup, and suppose $C_G(P)\le K\le N_G(P)$. If $eM=M$, put $b={\mathrm{Br}}_P(e)$, which is central in $kK$. Thenand every indecomposable summand of the second term has vertex not containing $P$. More precisely it is relatively projective for some $p$-subgroup of $K$ not containing $P$. In particular the vertex-$P$ Green correspondent lies in the block selected by the Brauer morphism. This is the precise restriction statement needed below.

Let $B$ have defect group of a block $D$, and let $b$ be its Brauer correspondent in $N=N_G(D)$. We first build a trivial-source module in $b$. The exact functoris nonzero on the trivial $kD$-module. Otherwise it would vanish on every $kD$-module, since a group algebra of a p-group in characteristic p is local and all composition factors are trivial; but $F(kD)=b\ne 0$. Choose an indecomposable summand $V$ of $F(k)$. Since $D◃N$, its restriction to $D$ is a nonzero direct sum of trivial modules. It is $D$-projective. It cannot have a proper vertex $Q<D$: restriction would make a trivial $D$-module relatively $Q$-projective, whereas on its endomorphisms the trace from $Q$ is multiplication by $[D:Q]=0$ in $k$, contrary to the D. Higman criterion. Hence $V$ has vertex $D$ and trivial source.

Take its Green correspondent $M$ in $G$. To verify that $M$ is in the intended block rather than just some block with a large defect, let $e^{\prime }$ be the global block idempotent acting on $M$. Nagao's theorem puts the vertex-$D$ summand $V$ of $M{\downarrow }_N$ in ${\mathrm{Br}}_D(e^{\prime })$. Thus $e_b{\mathrm{Br}}_D(e^{\prime })\ne 0$. The first main theorem already gives $e_b={\mathrm{Br}}_D(e_B)$; orthogonality of Brauer images of different global block idempotents forces $e^{\prime }=e_B$. Green correspondence preserves sources, so $B$ contains an indecomposable module with vertex $D$ and trivial source. The same argument proves the same-block compatibility of Green correspondence for every vertex-$D$ module used below.

For finite representation type, first suppose $D$ is cyclic of order $q$. Write $D=⟨g⟩$ and $t=g-1$. Then $kD\cong k[t]/(t^q)$, and the indecomposable modules for a cyclic p-group are $k[t]/(t^j)$, $1\le j\le q$, by Jordan normal form. Every indecomposable module in $B$ is $D$-projective by Question 1, so is a summand of an induction of one of these finitely many indecomposable $kD$-modules. Each induction has finitely many indecomposable summands. Therefore $B$ has finite representation type.

For the converse it is important to obtain infinitely many modules of full vertex $D$, and not silently assume that the field is infinite. If $D$ is noncyclic, its quotient by the Frattini subgroup is elementary abelian of rank at least two, so $D$ maps onto $C_p\times C_p$. A rank-one Frattini quotient would make any lift of its generator generate $D$, since every proper subgroup is contained in a maximal subgroup. Here is an explicit family of full-vertex modules for a noncyclic p-group valid over every field $k$. Set $x=g-1$, $y=h-1$ for the two quotient generators. Onput $x{v}_0=0$, $x{v}_i=w_i$ for $1\le i\le r$, $y{v}_i=w_{i+1}$ for $0\le i<r$, $y{v}_r=0$, and $x{w}_i=y{w}_i=0$. All products of $x,y$ are zero, so the relations $x^p=y^p=0$ and $xy=yx$ hold, including when $p=2$.

These modules are indecomposable. Their common kernel and radical are $W=⟨w_i⟩$. An endomorphism preserves $W$; let $A$ be its induced matrix on $L_r/W$ and $C$ its matrix on $W$. The equations $CX=XA$, $CY=YA$ for the two displayed shift maps force $A$ and $C$ to be the same scalar: the first and last columns give the boundary zeroes, and the recurrence $a_{j,i+1}=a_{j-1,i}$ forces all off-diagonal entries to vanish and all diagonal entries to agree. The remaining endomorphisms map the top into $W$ and vanish on $W$, so form a square-zero ideal. Thus the endomorphism ring is local. Inflate $L_r$ to $D$ and choose the infinitely many $r$ for which $p\nmid 2r+1$. Such an $L_r$ has vertex $D$: if $1={\mathrm{Tr}}_Q^D(\alpha )$ for a proper $Q<D$, taking ordinary matrix traces would givea contradiction. Their distinct dimensions ensure distinct isomorphism classes.

Each $F(L_r)=e_b{\mathrm{Ind}}_D^N{L}_r$ is nonzero, by exactness and the already proved $F(k)\ne 0$. Its restriction to $D$ is a summand of a sum of conjugates of $L_r$, by normality of $D$ and Mackey decomposition. Consequently every indecomposable summand chosen from $F(L_r)$ has vertex $D$, and has a source conjugate to $L_r$. If $b$ contained only finitely many indecomposables, their restrictions to $D$ would contain only finitely many possible sources, contradicting this family. Green correspondence and Nagao's theorem then transfer infinitely many vertex-$D$ indecomposables in $b$ to distinct indecomposables in $B$. We have proved

Finally, for $C_p=⟨g⟩$, the algebra $k{C}_p=k[t]/(t^p)$ has precisely the indecomposablesOn $M_j$, $g$ acts as a single size-$j$ Jordan block with eigenvalue $1$. Its submodules are exactly its ideals, hence the powers of $t$: an ideal has a generator of least degree, and multiplying that generator by a unit makes it a power of $t$. Therefore its unique composition series of a module iswith $j$ trivial one-dimensional composition factors. This is uniqueness of the actual chain, stronger than uniqueness of the multiset of factors. The algebra is local, so its sole principal indecomposable module is its regular module $M_p=k{C}_p$, of dimension and composition length $p$.

The principal block $B_0(G)$ is the unique block of a group algebra containing the trivial $kG$-module. Its central character of a block is augmentation $\epsilon :Z(kG)\to k$, and its block idempotent $e_0$ is the unique primitive central idempotent with $\epsilon (e_0)=1$. Its defect groups of a block are Sylow subgroups: if $e_0={\mathrm{Tr}}_D^G(a)$, augmentation gives $1=[G:D]\epsilon (a)$, so $p\nmid [G:D]$.

The Brauer third main theorem states that, if $b$ is a block of $kH$ with defect group $D$ and $D{C}_G(D)\le H\le G$, thenWe give a proof, including the normal-subgroup ingredient needed for the difficult implication.

First, block idempotents centralize a normal p-subgroup. If $P◃L$ is a p-subgroup, the ideal $J(kP)kL$ is nilpotent: conjugation preserves $J(kP)$, so its powers are $J(kP{)}^{m}kL$, eventually zero. For a central idempotent $e$ of $kL$, the difference $e-{\mathrm{Br}}_P(e)$ is a sum of nonfixed $P$-conjugation orbit sums. Such an orbit maps to a single element of $L/P$ multiplied by its size, which is zero in $k$. Thus the difference belongs to $J(kP)kL$. Since $P$ is normal, its centralizer is normal too, and the Brauer image is $L$-invariant; consequently it is itself a central idempotent of $kL$. Commuting central idempotents congruent modulo a nilpotent ideal coincide: their off-diagonal products are nilpotent idempotents, hence zero. ThereforeIt follows that central block idempotents of $kL$ are exactly the sums over $L$-orbits of primitive central idempotents of $k{C}_L(P)$. The principal block idempotent of $k{C}_L(P)$ is invariant under every automorphism preserving augmentation, so its singleton orbit is the principal block idempotent of $kL$.

In particular, if $P{C}_G(P)\le K\le L\le N_G(P)$, the groups $K,L$ have the same centralizer $C_G(P)$. Their principal block idempotents are both the principal block idempotent of $k{C}_G(P)$. By the definition using the central character of a block of block induction, a block of $K$ inducing to the principal block of $L$ must be principal: its idempotent, a sum of centralizer block idempotents, has nonzero overlap with this single principal idempotent, and is therefore precisely that idempotent. The forward implication also holds, by the same observation.

For an arbitrary subgroup $H$ in the theorem, use the Brauer first main theorem inside $H$ to replace $b$ by its correspondent $\beta$ in $K=N_H(D)$. This preserves principalness. Indeed a Brauer image preserves augmentation on central elements, since nonfixed $D$-orbits have sizes divisible by $p$; hence the principal block of $H$, when it has defect $D$, corresponds to the principal block of $K$. Conversely, if $\beta$ is principal, its induced central character of a block isso ${\beta }^H$ is principal. Transitivity gives ${\beta }^G=b^G$. Thus we may work with $D{C}_G(D)\le K\le N_G(D)$ and a block $\beta$ of defect $D$.

The forward implication is already proved by this augmentation calculation, now with $H$ replaced by $G$. For the converse, fix $G$ and suppose there is a counterexample with $\beta$ nonprincipal but ${\beta }^G$ principal. Choose one whose defect group $D$ has maximal order. Put $N=N_G(D)$ and $c={\beta }^N$. To verify the transitivity needed here, write $B={\beta }^G$. Its defining character gives $e_{\beta }{\mathrm{Br}}_D(e_B)=e_{\beta }$. The image ${\mathrm{Br}}_D(e_B)$ is $N$-invariant and central in $kN$, so the definition of $c$ gives $e_c{\mathrm{Br}}_D(e_B)=e_c$. If $E\ge D$ is a defect group of $c$, applying ${\mathrm{Br}}_E$ gives ${\mathrm{Br}}_E(e_c){\mathrm{Br}}_E(e_B)={\mathrm{Br}}_E(e_c)$, since $C_G(E)\subseteq C_G(D)$. The character defining $c^G$ therefore selects $e_B$. Thus $c^G={\beta }^G$. The normal-subgroup observation shows that $c$ is nonprincipal, since otherwise $\beta$ would be principal. Every defect group of $c$ contains the normal $p$-subgroup $D$ up to conjugacy: ${\mathrm{Br}}_D(e_c)=e_c\ne 0$. Choose a defect group $E\ge D$ of $c$. Then $C_G(E)\le C_G(D)\le N$, so $(G,N,c)$ is another admissible counterexample, now with defect group $E$. Maximality forces $E=D$.

The first main theorem applied to $N=N_G(D)$ therefore implies that the principal block $c^G$ has defect $D$. Thus $D$ is a Sylow subgroup of $G$, and also of $N$. The principal block of $N$ then has defect $D$ and, by the forward implication, induces to the principal block of $G$. Injectivity in the first main theorem gives $c=B_0(N)$, contradicting the established nonprincipalness of $c$. This proves the third main theorem.

A useful equivalent consequence, with its justification, isLet $a$ be a block idempotent of $k{C}_G(Q)$ occurring in the left side, and let $E$ be a defect group of $a$ containing the central $p$-subgroup $Q$. Then $C_G(E)\le C_G(Q)$, so $a^G$ is defined. Applying ${\mathrm{Br}}_E$ to $a{\mathrm{Br}}_Q(e_0)=a$ shows that the central character of a block defining $a^G$ selects $e_0$: deleting coefficients outside $C_G(E)$ can be done after deleting those outside $C_G(Q)$. Hence $a^G=B_0(G)$, and the theorem makes $a$ principal. The image is nonzero because its augmentation is $1$, so it is exactly the principal centralizer idempotent.

Now put $C=C_G(x)$ and $P=O_p(C)$, the p-core of a finite group. The hypothesis $O_{p^{\prime }}(C)=1$, using the p-prime core of a finite group, and the definition of a p-constrained group say $C_C(P)\le P$. The normal-subgroup observation puts every block idempotent of $kC$ inside $k{C}_C(P)\subseteq kP$. A group algebra of a p-group in characteristic p is local, so its only idempotents are $0,1$. Thus $kC$ has a single block, its principal block.

Write $Q=⟨x⟩$. By the trace and Brauer characterization of defect in Question 1,For the forward direction one can conjugate $Q$ into $D$; the nonzero image at $D$ then ensures the image at $Q$ is nonzero. The reverse direction follows because every subgroup with nonzero image is conjugate into a defect group. Since $kC$ has only one block, a nonzero image must equal $1=e_0(C)$. The preceding local-block argument then gives $B=B_0(G)$ by the third main theorem. Conversely, if $B$ is principal, its defect group is a Sylow subgroup and every $p$-element is conjugate into it. ThereforeThis includes $x=1$: in that case the hypotheses force $kG$ itself to have only its principal block.

Take $D=⟨(12)(34)⟩$ andEvery involution in $A_5$ is a double transposition. They form one conjugacy class: an odd $S_5$ conjugator can be made even by multiplying by a transposition centralizing the source double transposition. Thus all order-two subgroups of $A_5$ are conjugate. Since $|A_5|=60$, $P$ is a Sylow subgroup. A permutation normalizing $P$ fixes its unique common fixed letter, $5$, and every even permutation of the other four letters permutes its three double transpositions. Hence $N_{A_5}(P)=A_4$. Any permutation centralizing $(12)(34)$ fixes $5$; within $S_4$ it may exchange the two pairs and interchange letters in either pair, giving eight possibilities, of which exactly the four elements of $P$ are even. Thus $C_{A_5}(D)=P$. Since $P$ is abelian and contains $D$, also $C_{A_5}(P)=P$.

The given single block of $k{A}_4$ has identity $1$ and defect $P$, since ${\mathrm{Br}}_P^{A_4}(1)=1$ and $P$ is Sylow. By Brauer first main theorem, $k{A}_5$ has exactly one block with defect $P$.

Suppose a block idempotent $b$ had defect $D$. Then ${\mathrm{Br}}_D^{A_5}(b)$ is a nonzero idempotent in $kP$. A group algebra of a p-group in characteristic p is local, so this image is $1$. But both the Brauer projections at $D$ and at $P$ retain exactly the basis elements of the same centralizer $P$. ConsequentlyThus $b$ has the full Sylow defect $P$, contradicting maximality of $D$. These are the 2-modular defect groups of A5, and $\boxed{C_2\text{ cannot be a defect group}}$.

For a finite-dimensional module over $A$, the radical of a module satisfies $J(M)=J(A)M$. Henceand induction gives $J^r(U\oplus V)=J^r(U)\oplus J^r(V)$ for every $r$. A simple submodule of a direct sum projects into semisimple submodules of each summand, and equivalentlyThus the same argument, or induction through the defining quotients, givesThis is radical and socle series of a direct sum.

Now let $G$ be a finite $p$-group and let $k$ have characteristic $p$. The group algebra of a p-group in characteristic p is local, with unique simple module $k$. The socle of its regular module iswhich is one-dimensional. If $kG=U\oplus V$ with both summands nonzero, finite length gives nonzero socles for $U$ and $V$, and the direct-sum identity would make $\mathrm{Soc}(kG)$ at least two-dimensional. Therefore

The divisibility in (i) is the standard dimension test for a projective modular representation. If $P$ is a projective $kG$-module and $S$ is a Sylow p-subgroup of order $p^d$, then ${\mathrm{Res}}_S^{G}P$ is projective over $kS$. The group algebra of a p-group in characteristic p is local, so every finitely generated projective $kS$-module is free. ConsequentlyThis will apply to $P=\overline{W}$ in the implication (v)$\Rightarrow$(i).