Write , where and is the character of an irreducible representation. An irreducible representation is a cuspidal representation of a finite reductive group exactly when its Harish-Chandra restriction to every proper rational Levi subgroup of a rational parabolic subgroup is zero.
The needed identity is the Harish-Chandra restriction of a Deligne-Lusztig character. For a rational parabolic subgroup , the torus case of the induction-restriction formula gives
Here . The geometric meaning of the indexing condition is that only a rational conjugate of the inducing maximal algebraic torus lying in the Levi can survive taking -invariants. This is the established torus case of Deligne-Lusztig induction, valid without a restriction on ; it is not an appeal to an unrestricted induction-restriction conjecture. See Dudas and Michel's lectures, Theorem 14.4.
Suppose first that is an elliptic maximal torus, meaning it lies in no proper rational parabolic subgroup. For any proper rational , the indexing set in the displayed sum is empty. Indeed with would imply , itself a proper rational parabolic subgroup. Hence , and multiplication by gives . This proves cuspidality.
Conversely suppose for a proper rational parabolic subgroup. There is a unique Levi subgroup of containing this particular maximal algebraic torus: relative to , it is generated by and those root subgroups for which both the root and its negative occur in . Call it . Uniqueness and , imply , so this is a proper rational Levi. Transitivity of Deligne-Lusztig induction through this rational parabolic says
Set , allowing it to be a virtual character. Adjunction of Harish-Chandra induction and Harish-Chandra restriction, extended linearly to virtual characters, gives
Thus this Harish-Chandra restriction cannot vanish, so is not cuspidal. No positivity or irreducibility of is needed, and the sign in causes no cancellation problem. We have proved
The term elliptic maximal torus is relative to the ambient group: split central factors are allowed. The actual condition is absence of a proper rational parabolic subgroup containing .