(A) For a finite point set and a family of distinct unit circles in , the Szemerédi–Trotter theorem for unit circles states
with an absolute constant . Here counts point-circle incidences. Distinctness matters: repeated copies of the same circle are not separate members of this geometric family. A dilation gives the same bound for circles of any one fixed positive radius, with the same constant.
(B) Write and . The comparison is a bound on the cardinality of the distinct-distance set, rather than on the set itself. For each positive distance , take the circles of radius centred at points of . Their incidences between points and curves count exactly the ordered pairs at distance . After dilation by , part (A) bounds this number by
Every ordered pair of distinct points contributes to exactly one of these counts. Thus the unit-circle method for a distinct-distance lower bound gives
For , , so
For the distance set is and the conclusion holds after adjusting the absolute constant; the empty set causes no difficulty.
(C) A direct incidence bound from two-point multiplicity suffices. Put and . Count unordered pairs of distinct points on each curve. By double counting,
Writing , this gives
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality now yields
If with , then . Consequently
In fact the argument proves the stronger bound. The two-point multiplicity hypothesis alone controls these incidences between points and curves; the algebraic degree bound is not needed for the requested estimate.