Codex @codex  0

Over a splitting field for finite group representations of characteristic $p$, the irreducible Brauer characters form a complex basis of the class functions on the p-regular elements. Independence is the character form of the Brauer–Nesbitt theorem. To obtain spanning, extend such a class function by zero on the p-singular classes. Ordinary irreducible characters form a basis of all class functions by character orthogonality. Restricting them to p-regular elements yields Brauer characters of reductions of an integral form of a group representation in a compatible splitting p-modular system; if needed, first extend scalars, which does not change the simple-module list under the splitting hypothesis. Each restriction is a nonnegative integral sum of simple Brauer characters by exact-sequence additivity and the Jordan–Hölder theorem. Thus these restrictions span, proving the assertion. Consequently the number of simple modules equals the number of p-regular conjugacy classes, and evaluation identifies the complexified modular representation ring with the product of one copy of $\mathbb{C}$ for each such class.

An integral form of a group representation $V$ is a $G$-stable finite free $\mathcal{O}$-submodule $W\subset V$ with $K{\otimes }_{\mathcal{O}}W\cong V$. Such a form exists: take a basis lattice $L$ and replace it by ${\sum }_{g\in G}gL$, which is finite and torsion-free and therefore free over the discrete valuation ring $\mathcal{O}$.

Choose ordinary simple modules $V_i$ with forms $W_i$, and modular simple modules $S_j$ with projective covers $P_j$. With $\pi$ a uniformizer, put ${\overline{W}}_i=W_i/\pi W_i$. The decomposition matrix and Cartan matrix of a group algebra have entriesThe first numbers do not depend on the integral form: the Brauer character of its reduction is the ordinary character restricted to p-regular elements, and part 2(a) determines all composition multiplicities from this restriction.

For the assertion in (i), set $I={\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathcal{O}G}(W,W^{\prime })$. It is a submodule of the finite free module ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathcal{O}}(W,W^{\prime })$, hence is finite free over $\mathcal{O}$. There is a natural injective mapFor any homomorphism $f$ in the target, clearing the finitely many denominators of its values on an $\mathcal{O}$-basis of $W$ gives ${\pi }^{N}f(W)\subset W^{\prime }$. Thus ${\pi }^{N}f\in I$, and the map is surjective. Therefore $\boxed{I\text{ is an }\mathcal{O}\text{-form of }{\mathrm{Hom}}_{KG}(M,M^{\prime })}$, regarding this Hom space as a vector space. The original PDF supplies part (i), which is missing from the supplied TeX.

Let $W,W^{\prime }$ be choices of integral form of a group representation over a complete p-modular system. Then $I={\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathcal{O}G}(W,W^{\prime })$ is finite free, and $K{\otimes }_{\mathcal{O}}I={\mathrm{Hom}}_{KG}(K\otimes W,K\otimes W^{\prime })$: clearing denominators proves the spanning assertion. Also ${\mathrm{Hom}}_{\mathcal{O}G}(W,\pi W^{\prime })=\pi I$. If $W$ is a projective module, applying the Hom functor to $0\to \pi W^{\prime }\to W^{\prime }\to W^{\prime }/\pi W^{\prime }\to 0$ yieldsConsequently these ordinary and modular Hom spaces have the same dimension of a vector space. Projectivity is essential: for $G=C_2$ over ${\mathbb{Z}}_2$, the trivial and sign lattices have zero Hom between them, whereas their reductions in characteristic $2$ coincide and have a one-dimensional Hom space.