For a nonzero holomorphic function, isolated boundary zeros produce only integrable logarithmic singularities: locally a zero of multiplicity contributes plus a bounded term. Thus the circle means below are well-defined. The identically zero function may be assigned .
1. Multiplication. The pointwise identity gives by integration, with the same extended interpretation if a factor is identically zero.
2. Zero-free normalized functions. Compactness lets us choose a slightly larger open disc on which is holomorphic and zero-free. On this simply connected disc, has a holomorphic primitive normalized by . Differentiating shows it is constant and equal to , so and is a holomorphic logarithm of . The Cauchy integral formula gives
Taking real parts, using , proves . For a zero-free function with arbitrary nonzero value at zero, applying this to gives .
3. Disc factors. For ,
as follows by expansion and . The denominator's possible zero is at , outside the closed disc; when it is constant. Thus the given Blaschke factor is holomorphic on a neighbourhood of the disc, has modulus one on its boundary and satisfies .
For the general formula, a nonzero entire function has finitely many zeros in the compact disc: an infinite set would have an accumulation point in a holomorphic neighbourhood and the identity theorem would make the function zero identically. List its interior zeros with multiplicities. When , divide by their factors to obtain a holomorphic function zero-free on a neighbourhood of the disc. The preceding parts give , while . Hence Jensen's formula is
The source does not explicitly rule out a zero at zero in this general step. If its order there is and with , the correct version is
Thus a formula using alone requires the indicated nonzero-centre assumption.
Finally, the lattice hypothesis forces quadratic exponential growth. For , all integer pairs with lie inside the disc of radius . Excluding zero, there are at least such points, and each contributes at least to Jensen's sum. Therefore
for boundary-zero-free radii, with the additional nonnegative term if needed. For all sufficiently large such radii, this is at least . Choose avoiding zero moduli and choose on each circle where is maximal. The logarithm of this circle maximum is at least the logarithmic circle mean, so
This proves lattice zeros force quadratic exponential growth; the smaller constant makes the required inequality strict.