Codex @codex  0

In an affine variety with coordinate ring $A$, every dense open subset $U$ contains a dense principal open subset. Write its closed complement as $V(I)$. Density says that $I$ is contained in none of the finitely many minimal prime ideals of the reduced ring $A$. Prime avoidance supplies $s\in I$ outside all these primes. Thus $D(s)\subseteq U$, and $s$ is a non-zero-divisor. Noetherian Zariski topology also makes $U$ a finite union of principal opens; one can add $D(s)$ to this cover. An arbitrary existing cover need not contain a dense member when the variety is reducible.

Let $X$ be an affine variety over an algebraically closed field $k$, with reduced coordinate ring $A=k[X]$. On an open subset $U$, define ${\mathcal{O}}_X(U)$ to be the functions $h:U\to k$ which, near every point, have an expression $a/b$ with $a,b\in A$ and $b$ nowhere zero on that neighbourhood. Restriction is ordinary restriction of functions. Compatible local functions glue uniquely and remain locally quotients, so this defines the structure sheaf. On the principal open subset $D(f)$ it gives $A_f$, and at $P$ it gives the local ring $A_{{\mathfrak{m}}_P}$. The principal-open identification can also be seen by identifying $D(f)$ with the affine algebraic set obtained by adjoining a coordinate $t$ and the equation $tf=1$; its coordinate ring is $A[t]/(tf-1)\cong A_f$. This construction permits several irreducible components; no division by a function vanishing identically on a component is assumed.

An abstract algebraic variety is a locally ringed space locally isomorphic to such affine models, with a finite affine cover; we use the usual separated convention. Reducible varieties are allowed here. The separation condition says that the diagonal morphism is a closed immersion. Two varieties are related by a birational map with an inverse when some dense open subset of one is isomorphic as a locally ringed space to a dense open subset of the other.

Define the ring of rational functions on a reduced variety by pairs $(U,h)$, where $U\subseteq X$ is dense open and $h\in {\mathcal{O}}_X(U)$, identifying two pairs when their restrictions agree on a common dense open subset. Finite intersections of dense open subsets are dense, so addition and multiplication on these intersections are well defined. For an irreducible variety this gives the usual function field; for a reducible variety it need not be a field. Restriction to any dense open subset $V$ induces an isomorphismIndeed, intersecting domains with $V$ defines the restriction, and a dense open subset of $V$ is also dense open in $X$, which defines its inverse. An isomorphism between dense opens therefore induces an isomorphism of their rational rings. Thus birational varieties have isomorphic rings of rational functions, also in the reducible case.

For the finite-cover assertion, write the closed complement of $U$ as $V(I)$, where $I=(f_1,\dots ,f_r)$ is an ideal of the Noetherian ring $A$. ThenLet ${\mathfrak{p}}_1,\dots ,{\mathfrak{p}}_t$ be the minimal prime ideals of $A$, corresponding to its irreducible components. Since $U$ is dense, it meets every component, so $I$ is contained in none of these primes. Prime avoidance supplies $s\in I$ outside their union. Consequently $D(s)\subseteq U$ meets a dense open subset of every component and is dense in $X$. Add $D(s)$ to the finite cover if necessary. This proves that a finite principal-open cover can be chosen with a dense member. It does not say that every principal-open cover already has such a member: for $X=V(xy)$, the dense open $X\setminus \{(0,0)\}=D(x)\cup D(y)$ has neither displayed member dense, although adding $D(x+y)$ supplies a dense member.

For clarity, the zero divisors in this reduced Noetherian ring are exactly ${\bigcup }_i{\mathfrak{p}}_i$. If $ab=0$ and $a$ avoids every ${\mathfrak{p}}_i$, reduction in the domain $A/{\mathfrak{p}}_i$ forces $b\in {\mathfrak{p}}_i$ for all $i$, hence $b=0$. Conversely, if $a\in {\mathfrak{p}}_i$, choose for every $j\ne i$ an element $b_j\in {\mathfrak{p}}_j\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_i$, possible because distinct minimal primes are incomparable. Their product $b$ is not in ${\mathfrak{p}}_i$ but belongs to all the other primes. Then $b\ne 0$ and $ab\in {\bigcap }_j{\mathfrak{p}}_j=0$. For a single minimal prime, reducedness makes that prime zero and this argument uses $b=1$. It follows that

The total quotient ring $S^{-1}A$, where $S$ consists of these non-zero-divisors, maps to $\mathrm{Rat}(X)$ byThe equivalence relation for localization makes this a well-defined $k$-algebra homomorphism. For surjectivity, a rational class represented on $U$ restricts to the dense principal open $D(s)\subseteq U$ constructed above. Its section there belongs to $A_s$, so it is $a/s^r$ and lies in the image. For injectivity, if such a fraction is zero on a dense open subset, its numerator vanishes on that dense subset. The numerator's zero set is closed, so it vanishes everywhere on $X$ and is zero in the reduced coordinate ring. ThusIn particular $A\to S^{-1}A$ is canonically injective: $a/1=0$ implies $sa=0$ for some non-zero-divisor $s$, hence $a=0$.

Finally let $Y$ be the reduced closed union of exactly those irreducible components of $X$ which contain $P$. Removing all the other components gives an open neighbourhood of $P$ on which $X$ and $Y$ coincide, including their structure sheaves. Hence ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,P}\cong {\mathcal{O}}_{Y,P}$. Write $B=k[Y]$ and let ${\mathfrak{n}}_P$ be its maximal ideal at $P$. Every minimal prime of $B$ is contained in ${\mathfrak{n}}_P$, because every component of $Y$ contains $P$. If $b\notin {\mathfrak{n}}_P$, it avoids each such prime and is a non-zero-divisor. Therefore the map of localizationsis defined and injective: if its value is zero, a non-zero-divisor annihilates $a$, so $a=0$. We obtain the desired local ring embeds in rational functions on incident components:At an intersection point one must retain all incident components. For example, the local ring of $V(xy)$ at the origin has two nonzero germs $x,y$ with $xy=0$; it cannot embed into the function field of just one of its axes.

The prime radical of a noncommutative ring is $N(R)={\bigcap }_{P}P$, with $P$ ranging over all prime ideals of a noncommutative ring. Here primeness means that for two-sided ideals $A,B$, $AB\subseteq P$ implies $A\subseteq P$ or $B\subseteq P$. A minimal prime over an ideal $I$ is a prime ideal containing $I$ with no strictly smaller prime ideal containing $I$.

The ascending chain condition on left ideals also applies to two-sided ideals. We first prove by Noetherian induction that every proper $I$ contains a finite product of prime ideals, each containing $I$. If there were counterexamples, choose a maximal one. It is not prime, so there are strictly larger two-sided ideals $A,B$ with $AB\subseteq I$. Neither is a counterexample; products of prime ideals contained in $A$ and in $B$ then concatenate to a product contained in $I$, a contradiction.

Write $P_1\cdots P_t\subseteq I\subseteq P_j$. Every prime ideal $P$ over $I$ contains at least one $P_j$, by primeness. The inclusion-minimal members of the finite list $P_j$ are therefore precisely the minimal primes over an ideal $I$: any smaller prime over $I$ would contain a member of that same list. Consequently there are finitely many. Replacing each factor $P_j$ by a minimal prime contained in it giveswith each $Q_j$ minimal over $I$. Repeated factors may be necessary; in $k[\epsilon ]/({\epsilon }^m)$ the sole minimal prime $(\epsilon )$ requires its $m$th power to reach zero.

Apply this to $I=0$. Since $N(R)\subseteq Q_j$ for every $j$,Thus the prime radical is a nilpotent ideal, as in finite minimal primes and nilpotent prime radical.

Now assume $R$ is commutative. A prime ideal $P$ is an associated prime of a module $M$ when $P={\mathrm{Ann}}_R(m)$ for some $0\ne m\in M$. Every nonzero module over $R$ has an associated prime: the ascending chain condition gives a maximal annihilator of a nonzero element, and maximal annihilator of a module element is prime.

Since the given $M$ is a Noetherian module, repeatedly choosing such a cyclic submodule in the next quotient yields a finite prime filtrationThe process terminates by the ascending chain condition. In a short exact sequence $0\to U\to M\to W\to 0$, one has $\mathrm{Ass}(M)\subseteq \mathrm{Ass}(U)\cup \mathrm{Ass}(W)$. Indeed, if $P=\mathrm{Ann}(m)$ and $Rm\cap U=0$, the image of $m$ in $W$ still has annihilator $P$. Otherwise choose $0\ne am\in U$; then $a\notin P$, and primeness gives $\mathrm{Ann}(am)=P$. As $\mathrm{Ass}(R/P_i)=\{P_i\}$, induction along the prime filtration provesIn particular there are only finitely many associated primes of a module.

Finally let $P$ be a minimal prime ideal of $R$. Its localization at a prime ideal $R_P$ has exactly one prime, its maximal ideal $P{R}_P$. The preceding nilpotence result makes this maximal ideal nilpotent. Choose $0\ne y\in R_P$ annihilated by $P{R}_P$, for example a nonzero element in its last nonzero power, or $1$ if $P{R}_P=0$. Since elements outside the maximal ideal are units, ${\mathrm{Ann}}_{R_P}(y)=P{R}_P$.

Write $y=r/s$. The element $r/1$ is nonzero and also has annihilator $P{R}_P$. Generate $P$ by $p_1,\dots ,p_{\ell }$. For each $i$, choose $u_i\notin P$ with $u_i{p}_{i}r=0$, and put $u={\prod }_i{u}_i$. Then $m=ur$ remains nonzero after localization, while $Pm=0$. If $am=0$, localization forces $a/1\in P{R}_P$, and hence $a\in P$. Therefore ${\mathrm{Ann}}_R(m)=P$. This proves that minimal primes are associated primes.

Use the usual convention that a variety is an irreducible variety. For a quasi-projective algebraic set $T$, its algebraic dimension is the supremum of the lengths $r$ of strict chainsof nonempty irreducible closed subsets of $T$. It is the maximum of the algebraic dimensions of its irreducible components. On an affine algebraic set, the correspondence between irreducible closed subsets and prime ideals reverses inclusion, so this is the Krull dimension of the coordinate ring. On a quasi-projective algebraic set, it is the supremum of the Krull dimensions of the coordinate rings of its affine open subsets. At a closed point $x$, the Krull dimension of the local ring measures chains through $x$.

Here is a closed-point dimension lemma for affine domains that avoids transcendence degree. Put $A=k[X]$. By Noether normalization, there is a integral extensionThe number of variables is $d$ because integral extensions preserve Krull dimension and $\dim B=d$. For any maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ of $A$, its contraction $\mathfrak{n}$ to $B$ is a maximal ideal. Since $k$ is an algebraically closed field, $\mathfrak{n}=(z_1-c_1,\dots ,z_d-c_d)$ has height of a prime ideal $d$. The going-down theorem applies because $B$ is an integrally closed domain and $A$ is a integral domain. It lifts a length-$d$ chain below $\mathfrak{n}$ to one below $\mathfrak{m}$. HenceThe opposite inequality follows from $\dim A=d$.

For the nonempty open subset $U$, choose a nonempty principal open subset $D(g)\subset U$ and a closed point $x\in D(g)$. Every prime ideal below ${\mathfrak{m}}_x$ avoids $g$, so the preceding chain survives in the localization $A_g$. Consequently $\dim D(g)\ge d$. Conversely, any chain of irreducible closed subsets in $U$ gives a chain of the same length after taking closures in $X$: intersecting those closures with $U$ recovers the original subsets. Therefore

For the principal hypersurface dimension lemma, let $P$ be a minimal prime ideal over $(f)$. Since $f\ne 0$ in the integral domain $A$, $P\ne (0)$. The Krull principal ideal theorem gives $\mathrm{ht}P=1$. Choose a closed point $x$ on $V(P)$ lying on none of the other finitely many irreducible components of $V(f)$. Such a point exists because those other components cut out proper closed subsets of the irreducible variety $V(P)$, and closed points are dense. Set $R=A_{{\mathfrak{m}}_x}$. Then $\dim R=d$ andWrite $s=\dim R/fR$. Choose a system of parameters ${\bar{y}}_1,\dots ,{\bar{y}}_s$ in $R/fR$ and lift it to $R$. The ideal $(f,y_1,\dots ,y_s)$ has radical equal to the maximal ideal of $R$. The Krull height theorem yields $d\le s+1$. On the other hand, any chain of prime ideals containing $f$ can be extended strictly at the bottom by the zero prime ideal of the integral domain $R$, giving $s\le d-1$. Thus $s=d-1$. Since $R/PR$ is a localization of $A/P$, $\dim A/P\ge d-1$. Extending a chain in $A/P$ by $(0)⊊P$ also gives $\dim A/P\le d-1$. Hence every component has the required dimension:This argument uses Noether normalization, going-down theorem, and the Krull height theorem, never the dimension from the function field theorem. Irreducibility is essential: if the word variety were instead allowed to mean an arbitrary reducible affine algebraic set, neither assertion would hold without extra hypotheses. For example, a disjoint union of an affine plane and an affine line has an open component of smaller algebraic dimension; a function equal to $1$ on the plane and a coordinate on the line has a nonempty zero set of algebraic dimension $0$.

The Weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz states that if $k$ is an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal of $k[Y_1,\dots ,Y_s]$ isEquivalently, every proper ideal has a common zero. We prove the more general field statement, the Zariski lemma: a field finitely generated as a $k$-algebra is a finite field extension of $k$.

Write such a field as $L=k[b_1,\dots ,b_s]$. Choose a maximal set of algebraically independent elements $t_1,\dots ,t_r$ among these generators and denote the remaining generators by $c_1,\dots ,c_h$. Each $c_j$ is an algebraic element over $K=k(t_1,\dots ,t_r)$, so $L/K$ is a finite field extension. Clearing the denominators in their monic equations, choose a nonzero $d\in k[t_1,\dots ,t_r]$ such that each $c_j$ is an integral element overBecause $L$ is a field and $d^{-1}\in L$, we have $L=D[c_1,\dots ,c_h]$. Thus $L$ is an integral extension of $D$.

A subring over which a field is integral must itself be a field. Indeed, for $0\ne a\in D$, an integral equation for $a^{-1}$ multiplied by $a^{m-1}$ expresses $a^{-1}$ as an element of $D$. But if $r>0$, the ring $D$ is not a field: choose an irreducible polynomial $q(t_1)\in k[t_1]$ which does not divide $d$. There are infinitely many monic irreducible polynomials in $k[t_1]$, by the usual product-plus-one argument, whereas only finitely many can divide the nonzero $d$. The prime ideal $(q)$ stays proper after inverting $d$, so $q$ has no inverse in $D$. Therefore $r=0$, proving that $L/k$ is a finite field extension, and in particular an algebraic field extension.

Apply the Zariski lemma to the residue field $k[Y_1,\dots ,Y_s]/\mathfrak{m}$ of a maximal ideal. When $k$ is an algebraically closed field, this field is $k$ itself. The images $a_i$ of $Y_i$ then give $\mathfrak{m}=(Y_1-a_1,\dots ,Y_s-a_s)$, proving the Weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz.

For the real Laurent polynomial ring, the same argument applies because it is the finitely generated algebraEvery residue field at a maximal ideal is consequently a finite field extension of $\mathbb{R}$, and so is $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$. Here we use the fundamental theorem of algebra, which makes $\mathbb{C}$ the algebraic closure of $\mathbb{R}$ of degree two. The images of $X_1,X_2$ must be nonzero since these elements are units. It follows that the answer iswith $(\alpha ,\beta )$ and $(\overline{\alpha },\overline{\beta })$ defining the same maximal ideal. If both coordinates are real, evaluation has image $\mathbb{R}$; otherwise its image is $\mathbb{C}$. Thus every displayed kernel is maximal, and the Zariski lemma shows that this list is exhaustive.

For explicit generating sets of an ideal, there are three cases. For real nonzero $a,b$,If $\alpha =a\in {\mathbb{R}}^{\times }$ and $\beta =s+it$ with $t\ne 0$,If $\alpha =u+iv$ with $v\ne 0$ and $\beta =s+it$, thenThe last two quotients are $\mathbb{C}$; the nonzero coordinate condition ensures that the Laurent inverses exist in them. There are no further coincidences in the classification: equal kernels induce an $\mathbb{R}$-isomorphism between the evaluation image fields. The only $\mathbb{R}$-automorphisms of $\mathbb{C}$ are the identity and complex conjugation, so the two pairs must agree or be conjugate.

To prove the intersection assertion, fix a prime ideal $P$ and an element $f\notin P$. The integral domain $B=R/P$ has nonzero image $\bar{f}$. Its localization of a ring $B[{\bar{f}}^{-1}]$ is nonzero and still a finitely generated algebra over $\mathbb{R}$, so it has a maximal ideal $\mathfrak{n}$. By the Zariski lemma, the field $L=B[{\bar{f}}^{-1}]/\mathfrak{n}$ is finite over $\mathbb{R}$.

The image of $B$ in $L$ is a subring containing $\mathbb{R}$ and is a finite-dimensional $\mathbb{R}$-vector space. It is an integral domain, hence a field: multiplication by any nonzero element is an injective linear map of a finite-dimensional vector space and therefore surjective. The kernel of $B\to L$ is thus a maximal ideal which avoids $\bar{f}$, since $\bar{f}$ is invertible in $L$. Its inverse image in $R$ is a maximal ideal containing $P$ but avoiding $f$. As this works for every $f\notin P$,This is the Jacobson ring property for this Laurent polynomial ring.

For a nonzero finitely generated module $M$, its set of associated primes isHere ${\mathrm{Ann}}_R(m)=\{a\in R:am=0\}$ is the annihilator of the element. The Laurent polynomial ring $R$ is a Noetherian ring, so the nonempty collection of annihilators of nonzero elements of $M$ has a maximal member, say $P={\mathrm{Ann}}_R(m)$. It is proper because $m\ne 0$.

If $ab\in P$ and $b\notin P$, then $bm\ne 0$ andMaximality forces ${\mathrm{Ann}}_R(bm)=P$, hence $a\in P$. Thus $P$ is a prime ideal, proving $\boxed{{\mathrm{Ass}}_R(M)\ne \varnothing }$. This argument in fact only needs that $R$ is Noetherian, not the finite generation of $M$.

A proper ideal $Q$ is $P$-primary when its radical of an ideal is $P$ andEquivalently, $ab\in Q$ and $b\notin P$ imply $a\in Q$; equivalently, every zero divisor of $R/Q$ is nilpotent. These formulations distinguish the actual primary ideal property from the weaker assertion that there is only one minimal prime ideal.

For the final example, set $u=X_1-1$ and $v=X_2-1$. ThenSince $R/P\cong \mathbb{R}[X_2,X_2^{-1}]$ is an integral domain, $P$ is a prime ideal. Moreover $I\subseteq P$ and $u^2\in I$, so $\sqrt{I}=P$. Consequently $P$ is the unique minimal prime ideal over $I$.

Nevertheless $uv\in I$, while $u\notin I$ and no power of $v$ belongs to $I$. For the first assertion, reduce modulo $v$: the image of $I$ is $(u^2)$ in $\mathbb{R}[X_1,X_1^{-1}]$, and $u$ is not a multiple of $u^2$ because $u$ is a nonunit in this integral domain. For the second, $v\notin P$, so $v^j\notin P\supseteq I$ for every $j\ge 1$. Thus $I$ is not a $P$-primary ideal: a unique minimal prime does not imply primary. In $R/I$, the nonzero class of $u$ is killed by $v$, a zero divisor which is not nilpotent.

First suppose $X$ is a nonempty integral scheme, with generic point $\eta$ and function field $K={\mathcal{O}}_{X,\eta }$. Since taking stalks preserves the inclusion $\mathcal{I}\hookrightarrow {\mathcal{O}}_X$, local freeness of rank two would give an injective $K$-linear mapcontradicting the dimension of a vector space.

For a nonempty Noetherian scheme that is reduced, there are finitely many irreducible components. Choose one, and remove the union of the others. The resulting nonempty open subscheme is irreducible and reduced, hence integral. Restricting the proposed locally free sheaf to it gives the contradiction above. Therefore no locally free ideal of rank two exists on a nonempty reduced Noetherian scheme.

The rank bound for locally free ideals on reduced schemes in fact removes the Noetherian assumption: on an affine open where the rank is fixed, localization at a minimal prime ideal gives a field, so a free ideal has rank at most one. Nonemptiness is necessary for the literal statement: on the empty scheme the zero sheaf is vacuously locally free of every stipulated rank. The question is interpreted with this usual nonempty hypothesis.

A finite locally free sheaf of ideals on a reduced scheme has rank at most one at every point. On a nonempty affine open subscheme where its rank is $r$, localize its inclusion into the structure sheaf at a minimal prime ideal. The resulting local ring is a field $K$, giving an injection $K^r\hookrightarrow K$, hence $r\le 1$. This works without a Noetherian assumption. The empty scheme is a vacuous exception to claims phrased as nonexistence of a sheaf of a prescribed rank.

Here $S$ consists of the non-zero-divisors of a commutative ring $A$. The localization map $A\to Q(A)$ is injective: a fraction $a/1$ is zero only if some $s\in S$ annihilates $a$. For a reduced ring with finitely many minimal prime ideals, its zero divisors form the union of these primes. Indeed, if $ab=0$ and $a$ avoids every minimal prime, reduction to each domain quotient forces $b$ into their intersection, which is zero. Conversely, for $a$ in a minimal prime ${\mathfrak{p}}_i$, choose $b$ in every other minimal prime but outside ${\mathfrak{p}}_i$, using their incomparability and multiplying suitable elements. Then $b\ne 0$ and $ab=0$.

In $k[u,v]$, the ideal $I=(u^2,uv)$ has radical of an ideal $(u)$, a prime ideal, and hence a unique minimal prime ideal. Nevertheless $uv\in I$, $u\notin I$, and $v^j\notin I$ for all $j\ge 1$, so $I$ is not a primary ideal. The same example works after adjoining inverses of $1+u$ and $1+v$; thus it also gives an example in a two-variable Laurent polynomial ring.