For an analytic H1 space on the unit disk function, its fixed-aperture non-tangential maximal function obeys the displayed strong bound. First replace by , . The fact that modulus powers of holomorphic functions are subharmonic gives . Since a Poisson maximal function is dominated by the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function, the strong Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality yields . Pointwise interior convergence and the Fatou lemma remove . Analyticity permits this endpoint estimate; general boundary data have only a weak maximal bound.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 9 5 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
We prove sufficiency by a non-tangential maximal function and the layer cake representation. Write . First : three hyperbolic geodesic caps corresponding to arcs of normalized length , with equally spaced centers, cover the unit disc. This handles interior points and large arcs, not only a thin boundary strip.
Fix aperture two and set . The crucial H1 non-tangential maximal inequality on the disk isHere is its endpoint proof. For let , which is holomorphic across the closed unit disc. Since modulus powers of holomorphic functions are subharmonic, Poisson comparison givesThe estimate that a Poisson maximal function is dominated by the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function yields . The strong Hardy-Littlewood maximal inequality now givesFor each interior point , hence . The Fatou lemma proves the maximal inequality. This uses a genuine maximal bound; the Hardy-Littlewood maximal function is not strongly bounded on .
For , the set is open, since each interior point witnessing this strict inequality has an open boundary shadow. Write its disjoint arc components as . If and , the arc centered at with angular half-width lies in , because there. Thus it lies in one component , and has angular projection in with . The geodesic-cap and Carleson-box comparison puts all such points in for a fixed enlargement factor whenever is small. For large , use . If or is the entire circle, that same total-mass estimate applies. Summing, without needing the enlarged caps to be disjoint, givesThe layer cake representation and the proved H1 non-tangential maximal inequality on the disk finish the argument:Thus the two conditions are equivalent, with their least admissible constants comparable: and . This is the Carleson embedding theorem on the disk, proved at the analytic endpoint.