Dubins upcrossing inequality 2026-10-14
For a nonnegative supermartingale and , let count completed upcrossings of , allowing the first entry at time zero. The displayed bound holds for every integer . Construct the multiplicative upcrossing supermartingale, stop at the th completed crossing, and use its initial expected value and nonnegativity. The bound is exponential in the number of crossings, and complements the first-moment Doob upcrossing inequality.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 29 6 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put . Each successive crossing time , , is a stopping time, since in discrete time the event that a threshold is first met after the previous stopping time can be written as a finite union of events known at the candidate time. Use , with all later crossing times then infinite as well.
For the supermartingale assertion, build a process by finitely many switches. Begin with the constant supermartingale one. At switch to ; the new value at that time is at most one. At switch to the constant ; the old value there is . At switch to , whose value is at most , and at switch to the constant , whose value is at most the previous process. More generally, the switches at and are respectively from cash to and from that stock value to cash . Every switch is downward, including possible overshoots of either threshold.
Each candidate continuation is a supermartingale, being either constant or a fixed positive multiple of . Part (a) therefore proves by induction that the process obtained after the first switches is a supermartingale. It agrees with through . For fixed , its values are bounded in absolute value by a deterministic constant depending on times , which also verifies the required integrability rather than assuming it for an infinite sequence of pastings.
Stopping a discrete supermartingale preserves the property. Indeed its stopped increment is , with an -measurable indicator; integrability at any fixed time follows from a finite sum of the absolute values at earlier times. HenceThis is the multiplicative upcrossing supermartingale construction. The printed case uses , while was only defined from time zero. With the natural pre-start convention , it is the constant process one and the assertion also holds for . Without such an extension, that single displayed stopped process is undefined.
For the probability bound, the actual initial value isbecause exactly when . For an integer , stop after the th completed upcrossing, at . The nonnegative stopped supermartingale satisfiessince on the event in the left side. Letting , and identifying , proves the Dubins upcrossing inequality:Neither finiteness of nor uniform integrability is needed. The bound is for positive integers ; extending it to would generally be false, because its left side would be one while can be less than one.