Full-density sequence 2026-10-05
An increasing sequence of integers has full density when its range has natural density one. Convergence in density of a sequence means that, for each fixed tolerance, the exceptional indices have natural density zero.
For a probability measure-preserving system, strong mixing means that for every pair of measurable sets ,
A sequence has convergence in density of a sequence to when for each the exceptional set has natural density zero. A weakly mixing measure-preserving transformation has convergence in density of to for every . Equivalently, because these correlations are bounded,
Indeed the mean of the absolute discrepancy is at least times the exceptional frequency, while it is at most plus a uniform bound times that frequency. A signed Cesaro convergence of a sequence without absolute values is insufficient to define weak mixing.
The standard three-cut Chacon map is obtained by cutting and stacking. Start on with normalized Lebesgue measure, an initial tower consisting of , and a reservoir for spacers. At stage , cut every level of the current tower into three equal subintervals, producing three subcolumns. Add one new interval of the same width above the middle subcolumn. Stack the first subcolumn at the bottom, then the middle subcolumn with its spacer, then the third at the top. Define the partial transformation by translation from each level to the next, leaving the current top unmapped. These assignments extend the earlier partial transformation. Repeat indefinitely.
If is the number of levels and their width, then
Hence , , and the stage- tower has measure . The spacers consume total measure , precisely the reservoir. The increasing partial maps give the Chacon map modulo null sets. The tower tops and unused reservoir have measures tending to zero, and the construction yields an invertible measure-preserving transformation. With marking an original level and a spacer, the tower words satisfy and , so the first new word is . This describes the spacer placement without needing a proof of well-definedness. The three-cut convention agrees with the classical constant spacer vector described in Ryzhikov's construction.
For the correlation assertion, take the L2 inner product to be , linear in its first argument, and put . The Koopman operator is an isometry on , even when is not invertible. For the hint gives
To extend rigorously to all test functions, centre the observable: . Invariance of the integral gives . Let
For each fixed , by the same isometry identity. Therefore the limit is zero for every finite linear combination of these orbit vectors. By the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and , approximation extends this conclusion to every : the approximation error in the correlation is bounded by uniformly in . For , the correlation is identically zero because . The orthogonal decomposition by a closed subspace now gives the result for all . Thus
This is decay of autocorrelation implies weak convergence of an observable; no assumption that is an ergodic transformation, and no invertibility hypothesis was used, and is included.
Finally, strong mixing immediately implies the stated diagonal limit by taking . Conversely, suppose that limit holds for every . Apply the correlation result with and . Its hypothesis is exactly , and its conclusion is
Hence strong mixing is equivalent to diagonal set-correlation criterion for mixing. Using the orbit-span proof avoids an invalid polarization argument that would recover only the sum of the two directed cross-correlations from diagonal correlations.
For an increasing sequence of nonnegative integers, full-density sequence means that its range has natural density one:
For a sequence in a metric space, convergence in density of a sequence to means that, for every ,
In particular, a bounded nonnegative scalar sequence converging to zero in density has averages tending to zero: the average is at most plus its bound times the proportion of indices above .
Here is a Hilbert space form of the Van der Corput lemma, including the density version. Suppose , and put
Then
Since , it suffices for to converge to zero in density. A frequently used special case is that the correlation average tends to zero for every fixed .
To prove the lemma, extend the finite list by zero outside this range, and write . For ,
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for this sum, followed by expansion of the squared Hilbert space norm, gives
The coefficient counts the pairs of shifts separated by . Dividing by , bounding real parts by absolute values, and first taking the limit superior in for fixed yields
The right side tends to zero as under the stated hypothesis. This proves both the lemma and its density consequence.
For the polynomial application, fix a nonzero integer and let . For each fixed , the correlation phase is linear:
Thus, with ,
The coefficient is irrational, so . This geometric series is bounded in modulus by and tends to zero. All vanish, so the Van der Corput lemma gives
The Weyl criterion now shows that the fractional parts form an equidistributed sequence. For completeness, its sufficiency here follows directly: the displayed limits give the correct average for every trigonometric polynomial, including the constant term. The Stone-Weierstrass theorem extends this to every continuous function by uniform approximation. Approximating an interval's indicator function above and below by continuous functions gives its length as the limiting frequency. Hence
This proves the equidistribution of a quadratic polynomial with irrational leading coefficient using the required correlation argument.