Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 7 1 f Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The displayed estimate has two independent defects. Even for , its right side cannot use . At , choose nonnegative smooth functions with compact support and prescribe . This is a legitimate transported solution with . The proposed inequality would requireVelocity dilation makes arbitrarily large, while the other factors stay fixed. Thus no universal works with the same-time mixed Lebesgue norm.
There is a second issue after replacing by : the Jacobian determinant bounds give a local diffeomorphism, not necessarily a one-to-one map. Suppose additionally that is injective. With , the change of variables formula and giveSurjectivity is not needed because the domain of integration can be enlarged. With injectivity, the corrected estimate has . The upper bound is unnecessary.
More generally, dispersion with a nonlinear velocity map uses the area formula to sum over inverse branches. Define the weighted inverse multiplicityIf , the same argument gives the corrected estimate with . At most inverse branches give . Thus the missing global assumption concerns multiplicity, not merely local volume distortion.
For a noninjective map with constant Jacobian determinant giving a counterexample in two dimensions, write and setThe polar coordinates calculation gives , yet for every integer . To turn this into a failure of the estimate, take a small open disk about that avoids the origin. For each of inverse branches over , choose a smooth cutoff supported on that branch, where has support strictly inside and is extended by zero. These velocity supports are disjoint. SetThen , independent of , whereas at a fixed and suitable ,The last integral is positive and independent of . No finite exists for this fixed , although . In one dimension, by contrast, a nonvanishing derivative has a constant sign, so the lower derivative bound makes a global diffeomorphism.