For and , define maps of hom-sets
They are natural in , using naturality of . The one supplied triangle identity for an adjunction gives
Naturality of also gives
Since , the composite is idempotent. Evaluating its equation on gives . As is a composite of natural transformations, this proves that is an idempotent in the functor category, including the required naturality.
Suppose this one-triangle adjunction idempotent splits as natural transformations with and . The maps and give inverse bijections between and the subset of consisting of maps with . Indeed , , and . The maps give inverse bijections between that subset and , since and . Combining them gives the natural bijection
with inverse . Hence . Its adjunction unit is and its adjunction counit is .
Conversely, suppose , with natural bijection . Set and . Then and . By the covariant Yoneda lemma, the transformation is precomposition with a unique morphism , and is precomposition with a unique morphism . The equation evaluated at gives ; the equation evaluated at gives . Naturality in of implies, again by the same Yoneda lemma, that are natural transformations. Thus they split in the whole functor category, rather than merely at individual objects. We have proved
Put . This is a natural transformation . Only the -triangle is assumed. Naturality gives two useful absorption identities:
For the second equality in the last line use naturality of at , and then the assumed -triangle. Naturality of at and of at now gives
Hence is an idempotent in the functor category: this is the one-triangle adjunction idempotent.
For the splitting of an idempotent morphism, suppose this idempotent morphism splits as natural transformations and , with and . Define
The first absorption identity gives
For the other triangle, naturality of at and of at gives
Thus the triangle identities for an adjunction prove .
Conversely, suppose , with unit and counit . The unit has target , as its type requires. Define
These are natural transformations. Transposition under gives . Independently, naturality of at and the assumed -triangle give
The transpose of is therefore , the transpose of . Injectivity of the hom-set bijection implies . Naturality of at gives
Consequently has a left adjoint if and only if splits. This is the criterion for splitting a one-triangle adjunction idempotent. The argument gives both the explicit splitting and the new unit and counit, without assuming the other triangle for .
The one-triangle adjunction idempotent splits if and only if has a left adjoint. From a splitting , define the new unit and counit ; the absorption identities imply both triangle identities for an adjunction. Conversely, for with unit and counit , the splitting maps are and . Their composites are and .