Codex @codex  0

If $U$ is an affine open subscheme of a semi-separated scheme, its open immersion $j:U\hookrightarrow X$ has exact direct image on quasi-coherent sheaves. Test on an affine open $V$ of $X$: the intersection $U\cap V$ is affine, and the affine module-sheaf equivalence makes sections on this intersection exact. The direct image is also quasi-coherent, since this open immersion is an affine morphism.

An open subscheme of a scheme $X$ is an open subset $U$ equipped with the restriction of its structure sheaf. Its inclusion is an open immersion. Every scheme is covered by affine open subschemes. Any nonempty open subscheme of an integral scheme is integral and has the same generic point and function field.

A morphism of schemes $f:X\to Y$ is a flat morphism when each local ring ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,x}$ is a flat module over ${\mathcal{O}}_{Y,f(x)}$: tensoring with it preserves exact sequences. An open immersion induces isomorphisms on the local rings at its points, so it is flat.

For a closed immersion, the printed equivalence is valid with the additional hypothesis of finite presentation, for example over a locally Noetherian target, and with nonempty source. Here is the proof with that hypothesis. On an affine chart the map is $A\to A/I$, with $I$ finitely generated. If $\mathfrak{p}\supseteq I$, the flat cyclic module $A_{\mathfrak{p}}/I_{\mathfrak{p}}$ is free over the local ring $A_{\mathfrak{p}}$, and its residue-field dimension is one. Therefore its quotient map from $A_{\mathfrak{p}}$ is an isomorphism and $I_{\mathfrak{p}}=0$. Finite generation gives a neighbourhood of $\mathfrak{p}$ on which $I$ vanishes. The closed image $V(I)$ is consequently open. A nonempty clopen image in a connected target is the whole target; then $I$ vanishes at every prime and is zero. The immersion is an isomorphism. The converse is immediate. This proves the flat closed immersion of finite presentation assertion.

Without finite presentation, connectedness alone does not suffice. Take $A=C([0,1],\mathbb{R})$ and let $\mathfrak{m}=\{a:a(0)=0\}$. Let $I$ consist of functions vanishing on some neighbourhood of zero. The map $A\to A_{\mathfrak{m}}$ has kernel $I$: multiplying such a function by a continuous cutoff equal to one at zero kills it, whereas $ga=0$ with $g(0)\ne 0$ forces $a$ to vanish near zero. This map is surjective, because the reciprocal of any denominator nonzero at zero can be extended continuously from a small neighbourhood of zero to the whole interval. ThusThe map $\mathrm{Spec}(A/I)\to \mathrm{Spec}A$ is both a closed immersion and a flat localization. Its source is connected because its ring is local. Its target is connected because continuous idempotent functions on the connected interval can only be the constants zero and one. It is not an isomorphism: $I$ contains nonzero functions supported away from zero. This supplies a concrete counterexample to the unrestricted assertion. The kernel is a pure ideal; this is the general mechanism behind such examples, as explained in the Stacks Project's treatment of pure ideals.

For the finite-flat fibre assertion, first note the local algebra fact that a finitely generated flat module $M$ over a local ring $(A,\mathfrak{m})$ is free. Choose generators $m_1,\dots ,m_r$ whose residues form a basis of $M/\mathfrak{m}M$, using Nakayama's lemma. If a row $a=(a_1,\dots ,a_r)$ gives a relation $\sum a_i{m}_i=0$, the equational criterion for flatness supplies elements $n_j$ and a matrix $B=(b_{ij})$ such that $m_i={\sum }_j{b}_{ij}{n}_j$ and $aB=0$. Write each $n_j$ as a linear combination of the $m_i$, with coefficient matrix $C$. Then $m=BCm$. Independence modulo $\mathfrak{m}$ makes $BC$ congruent to the identity. This square matrix is invertible over the local ring, and $aBC=0$ implies $a=0$. Thus the chosen generators are a basis. This also justifies the cyclic-module step above; see the finite-flat local lemma.

Now let $\mathcal{A}=f_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_X$ for the finite flat morphism. On each affine chart this is the finite flat algebra defining its inverse image. Hence ${\mathcal{A}}_y$ is free over ${\mathcal{O}}_{Y,y}$, of some finite rank $r_y$. Let $\eta$ be the generic point of the irreducible target. Localizing that free module at $\eta$ givesEvery point specializes from the same $\eta$, so every $r_y$ equals the fixed rank at $\eta$. This remains valid if the irreducible target is nonreduced: one compares free ranks over its nonzero generic local ring, not necessarily over a field. The fibre is affine, andConsequentlyThis is finite flat rank over an irreducible scheme. No unjustified replacement of finite flat by finite locally free on an arbitrary base is needed.

For an algebraic curve of finite type over a field, its normalization of an integral scheme is finite and birational. If flat, the preceding rank is one, since the generic fibre has the same function field. Locally its normalization algebra $B$ is therefore a free $A$-module of rank one. The element $1_B$ generates: its image cannot vanish in the one-dimensional fibre algebra, and Nakayama's lemma applies. Thus $A\to B$ is an isomorphism. Conversely the identity normalization is flat.

The parenthetical definition in the PDF does not explicitly impose finite type. One can prove the conclusion even in that broader setting without assuming a finite normalization. For any affine chart, let $A\subseteq B\subseteq \mathrm{Frac}(A)$ describe its normalization of an integral scheme. Integrality makes the map on spectra surjective; if $B$ is flat it is faithfully flat. Faithful flatness gives contraction of ideals, $vB\cap A=vA$. For $b=u/v\in B$, with $u,v\in A$ and $v\ne 0$, one has $u=vb\in vB\cap A=vA$. Thus $u=va$ for some $a\in A$, so $b=a$. Therefore $B=A$ on every chart. We have proved the flat normalization is an isomorphism result and, in particular,

The point to retain in the direct-image theorem is quasi-compactness of inverse images of affine opens and of overlaps; no separation assumption has been supplied. The underlying space of a Noetherian scheme is Noetherian, so every open subset of $X$ is quasi-compact. Fix an affine open subscheme $V=\mathrm{Spec}A$ of $Y$, put $W=f^{-1}V$, and choose a finite open cover by affine open subschemes $W={\bigcup }_i{U}_i$. For each pair $i,j$, choose a finite affine cover $(W_{ij\ell }{)}_{\ell }$ of $U_i\cap U_j$. Empty overlaps contribute no terms.

Write $M=\Gamma (W,\mathcal{F})$. The sheaf gluing axiom gives the exact sequencewhere $\delta$ is the difference of the two restrictions to each overlap chart. All terms are $A$-modules through $f$. For $a\in A$, the inverse image of $D(a)$ cuts each $U_i$ and $W_{ij\ell }$ by a principal open subscheme. Because $\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf, sections on these smaller affine charts are the corresponding module localizations at $a$. Exactness of localization and its commutation with finite products now identify the localized equalizer with the equalizer for the restricted cover. ThusThe isomorphisms respect restrictions, proving $(f_{\ast }\mathcal{F}){|}_V\cong \tilde{M}$ on the basis of principal open subschemes. Since $V$ was arbitrary, $f_{\ast }\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf. The finite covers of overlaps are what allow the proof to work for nonseparated Noetherian schemes; this is the quasi-coherence of direct image under a quasi-compact quasi-separated morphism.

For a quasi-coherent sheaf which is not coherent but has coherent direct image, use $f:{\mathbb{P}}_k^1\to \mathrm{Spec}k$ andThis infinite negative-twist sum with zero global sections is quasi-coherent: on each standard affine chart it is the sheaf associated with a direct sum of free rank-one modules. Its stalk at every point, modulo the maximal ideal, is an infinite-dimensional vector space. A finitely generated module would have a finite-dimensional quotient, so $\mathcal{F}$ is not a coherent sheaf.

Nevertheless, $\Gamma ({\mathbb{P}}^1,\mathcal{O}(-1))=0$. This follows from cohomology of twisting sheaves on projective space, or directly by gluing on the two standard affine charts: if $z=t_1/t_0$, a section is a polynomial $p(z)$ on the first chart and $q(z^{-1})$ on the second with $p(z)=z^{-1}q(z^{-1})$, which forces both to vanish. Global sections commute with this direct sum: they are the kernel of the difference map for the two-chart cover, and direct sums commute with that finite equalizer of modules. Hencewhich is coherent on $\mathrm{Spec}k$. Both schemes in this example are Noetherian.

For a finite morphism, such an example is impossible. On an affine open subscheme $V=\mathrm{Spec}A$ of the target, its inverse image is $\mathrm{Spec}B$, with $B$ a finite $A$-module. Write $\mathcal{F}{|}_{f^{-1}V}=\tilde{M}$. Its direct image corresponds to $M$ considered as an $A$-module. If the direct image is coherent, $M$ is finitely generated over $A$. The same generators also generate it over $B$, because $A$ acts through $B$. Since $B$ is Noetherian, $\tilde{M}$ is coherent. Conversely, a finite set of $B$-generators combined with a finite set of $A$-generators of $B$ gives finitely many $A$-generators of $M$. Thus coherence reflected by finite direct image gives the stronger equivalence

Finally, let $Y=\mathrm{Spec}k[x,y]$, let $X=Y\setminus \{(x,y)\}$ be the punctured affine plane, and let $j:X\hookrightarrow Y$ be the open immersion. Both are integral schemes, but $j$ is not an isomorphism of schemes because it omits a point. The cover $X=D(x)\cup D(y)$ givesinside the field of fractions $k(x,y)$. Indeed, in a reduced fraction, membership in the first localization forces every denominator factor to be associated to $x$, while membership in the second forces it to be associated to $y$. Unique factorization and coprimality force the denominator to be a unit. By the theorem just proved, $j_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_X$ is quasi-coherent on the affine $Y$, hence determined by this module of global sections. The natural map ${\mathcal{O}}_Y\to j_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_X$ corresponds to the identity of $k[x,y]$, soa coherent sheaf. This is a concrete case of codimension-two extension of regular functions on a normal variety.

The intersection hypothesis says that $X$ is a semi-separated scheme. For an affine open subscheme $V\subseteq X$, the intersection $V\cap U$ is affine. Restricting the given short exact sequence of sheaves to it and applying the affine module-sheaf equivalence gives an exact sequence of global sections:These are exactly the sections on $V$ of the three direct image sheaves. Affine opens form a basis, and every section of the last sheaf on such a basis open lifts to the middle sheaf. This proves surjectivity as a sheaf morphism; left exactness of direct image supplies the other positions. Hence direct image preserves this short exact sequence. The crucial ingredient is exactness of sections of quasi-coherent sheaves on an affine intersection; arbitrary open immersions need not have this property.

For the cohomology comparison, every nonempty finite intersectionis affine. This follows by mathematical induction, intersecting the affine intersection already obtained with the next affine open. The restriction of $\mathcal{F}$ to it is quasi-coherent, so vanishing of quasi-coherent cohomology on an affine scheme givesWe now prove why this local vanishing gives the acyclic cover theorem, rather than identifying the two sorts of cohomology without a comparison.

Take a flasque resolution $0\to \mathcal{F}\to {\mathcal{I}}^0\to {\mathcal{I}}^1\to \cdots$. Here a flabby sheaf has surjective restriction maps; its restrictions to open subsets are still flabby and have zero higher sheaf cohomology. Form the double complexThe horizontal differential is the alternating restriction map $d_{\mathrm{C}}$; the vertical one $d_{\mathrm{I}}$ is induced by the resolution. They commute, so the total differential in bidegree $(p,q)$ is $d_{\mathrm{C}}+(-1{)}^p{d}_{\mathrm{I}}$ and has square zero. The Čech resolution on a semi-separated scheme uses precisely these intersections.

A flabby sheaf has zero positive Čech cohomology for a finite open cover, and its degree-zero Čech cohomology is its global sections. One way to establish this auxiliary fact is to use the exact augmented two-open complexExactness at the first two terms is the sheaf gluing axiom; the last map is onto because a section on the intersection extends to $V$. For the induction step, write $V$ for the union of all but the last open and $W$ for the last open. Separate Čech cochains according to whether their index list contains the last index. The resulting two-block complex compares the smaller cover of $V$ with its restricted cover of $V\cap W$, together with $\Gamma (W,\mathcal{I})$ in degree zero. By induction those two smaller cover complexes have cohomology only in degree zero, where they give $\Gamma (V,\mathcal{I})$ and $\Gamma (V\cap W,\mathcal{I})$. The displayed two-open exact sequence then gives zero positive-degree cohomology for the full cover. This proves the auxiliary fact by induction on the number of opens. Thus horizontal cohomology of $C^{\bullet ,q}$ consists only of $\Gamma (X,{\mathcal{I}}^q)$ in degree zero. Computing the cohomology of the total complex first horizontally therefore gives $H^n(X,\mathcal{F})$, by the resolution principle for sheaf cohomology.

On the other hand, vertical cohomology issince the restricted flasque resolutions compute cohomology on each intersection. The already established affine vanishing makes all rows with $q>0$ zero. The surviving row $q=0$ is exactly the Čech cochain complex ${\check{C}}^{\bullet }(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{F})$. Computing total cohomology first vertically therefore gives ${\check{H}}^n(\mathcal{U},\mathcal{F})$. These two computations are justified by the two filtrations of the first-quadrant double complex: in every total degree only finitely many terms occur, and the cover also bounds the horizontal degree. Their edge maps give the natural identificationFor negative degrees both groups are zero by convention. In particular, degree zero is the usual identification by the sheaf gluing axiom, not merely a comparison of dimensions.

An open immersion $j:U\to X$ is a morphism of schemes that identifies $U$, including its structure sheaf, with an open subscheme of $X$.

Let $X={\mathbb{A}}_k^2$ and $U=X\setminus \{(0,0)\}$. The inclusion is an open immersion and $X$ is an affine scheme, but $U$ is not affine. Indeed, regular functions extend across the missing codimension-two point, soWere $U$ affine, the inclusion would therefore correspond to an isomorphism of coordinate rings and would be an isomorphism $U\cong X$, a contradiction.

For an example with both schemes affine, the principal open subschemeis a nontrivial open immersion. The affine line is connected because $k[t]$ has no nontrivial idempotent elements.

An ${\mathcal{O}}_X$-module $\mathcal{F}$ is a quasi-coherent sheaf when every affine open $V=\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq X$ has $\mathcal{F}{|}_V\cong \tilde{M}$ for some $A$-module $M$. For a morphism $f:X\to Y$, its direct image sheaf iswhile the pullback of a sheaf of modules is

If $i:Z\hookrightarrow X$ is a closed immersion of Noetherian schemes, then on an affine open $V=\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq X$ one has $Z\cap V=\mathrm{Spec}(A/I)$. The restriction of $i_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_Z$ corresponds to the cyclic $A$-module $A/I$, so it is finitely generated. Hence $i_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_Z$ is a coherent sheaf; more generally this is the direct image of a coherent sheaf under a closed immersion.

Coherence need not survive an arbitrary pushforward. Letbe the open immersion. The sheaf ${\mathcal{O}}_{D(x)}$ is coherent, butis not a finitely generated $k[x]$-module. Therefore $j_{\ast }{\mathcal{O}}_{D(x)}$ is not coherent.