First-order rough-surface scattered field 2026-10-06
Taylor expansion of the Dirichlet boundary condition gives the first-order boundary trace at the mean plane. The outgoing angular spectrum then propagates it. A zero-mean surface gives zero mean for this linear rough correction, while the complete scattered field still contains its nonzero flat reflection.
Outgoing angular spectrum 2026-10-06
The outgoing angular spectrum propagates prescribed scalar boundary data into a half-space. For time dependence, has nonnegative real part on propagating modes and nonnegative imaginary part on evanescent modes. Its trace at the boundary is , and each mode solves the Helmholtz equation. The spectral representation can be interpreted through distributions for nondecaying plane-wave data.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 72 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Work above the surface, with time dependence. Define the scattered field by , so it includes the reflection from a flat surface. For small-height Dirichlet scattering, write and expandThe zeroth-order total field satisfies the Dirichlet boundary condition . Taylor expansion at the perturbed boundary givesThus the first-order rough-surface scattered field has mean-plane boundary data .
Use the outgoing angular spectrum to solve this boundary-value problem. For , letThe branch ensures upward propagation or upward evanescent decay. Each component solves the Helmholtz equation, and has trace at . ConsequentlyThis gives the scattered field through first order by adding the two contributions. If one reserves “rough scattered field” for the non-specular correction, it is alone; the convention here keeps the flat reflection as well.
The expansion is in height for a fixed sufficiently regular profile. The condition controls the incident wave's height expansion, but very short spatial scales can create large evanescent normal derivatives. The surface regularity and relevant spectral moments must also control the subsequent boundary expansions; small amplitude alone is not a uniform guarantee for arbitrarily fine roughness.