= Solution
The first term assigns <energy> $\epsilon_i$ to occupying the localized orbital at site $i$. The hopping term moves an <electron> between neighbouring sites, producing kinetic delocalization and band dispersion; <Hermitian> conjugate hops make the <Hamiltonian> <Hermitian>. The final term costs $U>0$ only when both <spin> states occupy the same local orbital. This is a <Hubbard model> with an on-site Coulomb penalty, not a classical interaction between magnetic dipoles.
At one <electron> per site and large $U$, a real hop is energetically costly, but a virtual hop into a doubly occupied intermediate state is possible. Opposite-spin states can exploit these virtual processes and lower their <energy>, while parallel spins cannot occupy the same one-orbital site. The resulting singlet–triplet splitting produces antiferromagnetic <Hubbard kinetic exchange>.
There is a terminology qualification. The paper calls this overlap-mediated process “<direct exchange>” because the hopping is directly between neighbouring magnetic orbitals. In the stricter distinction between <direct Coulomb exchange versus kinetic exchange>, the displayed <Hamiltonian> omits an explicit intersite Coulomb exchange integral. The antiferromagnetic $t^2/U$ mechanism derived below is kinetic exchange; a genuine intersite <direct exchange> term is separate and can compete with it. This distinction also separates the model from ligand-mediated <superexchange> in part f.
Back to article page
