= Solution
4-Fluorophenol probes acceptor strength because it donates its OH <hydrogen>. The qualitative order is \b[C $>$ D $>$ B $>$ A]: the <electron>-rich lactam <oxygen> is the strongest acceptor here, the secondary <amine> is next, <pyridine> <nitrogen> is intermediate, and <aldehyde> <oxygen> is weakest. Resonance donation from <amide> <nitrogen> increases the lactam <oxygen>'s basicity relative to an ordinary <aldehyde> or <ketone> <oxygen>. The N-methylpyrrole site in A does not add an independent <amine>-like acceptor.
N-Methylpyrrolidin-2-one is a <carbonyl> acceptor without N–H, so it instead probes the solute's donor ability. \b[B $>$ C $\gg$ A and D]: B's phenolic OH is a strong donor, the lactam N–H of C is appreciable, A lacks a conventional donor, and D's neutral secondary-<amine> N–H is weak. The <amine> can be a good acceptor and a poor donor at the same time; the two properties are not opposites on one scale.
These are association equilibria in cyclohexane, where solvent competition for <hydrogen bonds> is weak. The quoted constants should be compared within each probe series, not treated as solvent-independent measures. At 298 K, as an illustrative common temperature, a tenfold increase in $K_a$ corresponds to a binding free-energy advantage $RT\ln10\simeq5.7\ \mathrm{kJ\,mol^{-1}}$. This does not imply the experiment's temperature was specified, nor that every difference is the energy of one isolated <hydrogen bond>.
Back to article page
