= Solution
The <Standard Model> uses the local <gauge group> $SU(3)_c\times SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y$. Its <Higgs field> is a complex <Higgs doublet> of <hypercharge> $Y=1/2$. A bare <mass> term for a weak <gauge boson>, or for a charged <fermion> joining inequivalent left- and right-handed gauge representations, would not respect the unbroken electroweak construction. Instead introduce a gauge-invariant <Higgs potential>
$$
V(\Phi)=-\mu^2\Phi^\dagger\Phi+\lambda(\Phi^\dagger\Phi)^2,\qquad\lambda>0,\quad\mu^2>0.
$$
Its minima satisfy $\Phi^\dagger\Phi=v^2/2$, $v^2=\mu^2/\lambda$. Choosing a representative $\langle\Phi\rangle=(0,v)^T/\sqrt2$ leaves $Q=T_3+Y$ unbroken. In this description <electroweak symmetry breaking> is $SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y\to U(1)_{\rm em}$; the underlying local <gauge symmetry> remains a redundancy of the theory. A vacuum representative is not a physical explicit violation of gauge invariance.
In <unitary gauge>, write $\Phi=(0,v+H)^T/\sqrt2$. The <gauge-covariant kinetic term> $|D_\mu\Phi|^2$ produces
$$
m_W=\frac{gv}{2},\qquad m_Z=\frac{v}{2}\sqrt{g^2+g'^2},\qquad m_\gamma=0,
$$
with $\tan\theta_W=g'/g$ and $e=g\sin\theta_W$. Three angular scalar directions supply the <longitudinal gauge-boson polarizations> of $W^+,W^-,Z$, while one real radial <Higgs boson> survives with $m_H^2=2\lambda v^2$. Counting physical <degrees of freedom> checks the <Higgs mechanism>: the electroweak gauge sector and scalar doublet have $4\times2+4=12$ before the rearrangement and $3\times3+2+1=12$ afterwards.
The <Higgs potential> also fixes the scalar self-interactions:
$$
V=\text{constant}+\frac{m_H^2}{2}H^2+\frac{m_H^2}{2v}H^3+\frac{m_H^2}{8v^2}H^4.
$$
The color gauge group is unbroken, so <gluons> remain massless. The same electroweak kinetic term fixes
$$
\mathcal L\supset\frac{2m_W^2}{v}HW_\mu^+W^{-\mu}+\frac{m_Z^2}{v}HZ_\mu Z^\mu
+\frac{m_W^2}{v^2}H^2W_\mu^+W^{-\mu}+\frac{m_Z^2}{2v^2}H^2Z_\mu Z^\mu.
$$
Gauge-invariant <Yukawa couplings> such as $-y_d\bar Q_L\Phi d_R-y_u\bar Q_L\widetilde\Phi u_R+\mathrm{h.c.}$ give $m_f=y_fv/\sqrt2$ and the physical coupling $-m_fH\bar f f/v$. These relations predict stronger Higgs couplings to heavier massive particles; they do not determine the Yukawa parameters themselves. The minimal <Standard Model> does not supply observed neutrino masses. The surviving <Higgs boson> is neutral and has <spin> zero; its <mass> and self-coupling are tied to the curvature of the <Higgs potential>, not fixed by the gauge couplings alone. Higgs exchange also provides the <Higgs cancellation in longitudinal vector scattering>, maintaining the required high-energy behavior of weak amplitudes.
At a proton collider, important production mechanisms are <gluon-fusion Higgs production> through a heavy-quark loop, <vector-boson fusion> with two outgoing quark jets, associated $WH$ or $ZH$ production, and production with a <top quark> pair. At an <electron>–positron collider, <Higgsstrahlung> $e^+e^-\to ZH$ is a clean example. Tree-level decays include <Higgs decay to a fermion pair> and, when allowed, <Higgs decay to two W bosons> or <Higgs decay to two Z bosons>. Below an on-shell vector-pair threshold, one or both vectors can be virtual. The $gg$ and $\gamma\gamma$ channels arise through loops; neutral colorless $H$ has no corresponding direct tree-level gauge coupling. Rates and <branching fractions> depend on both couplings and kinematics, so “heaviest available particle” is a guide rather than a complete rule.
The <Higgs boson discovery in 2012> supplied an experimental test. The <ATLAS experiment> and <CMS experiment> reconstructed two-<photon> and four-lepton <invariant masses> in <Large Hadron Collider> proton collisions. <Electromagnetic calorimeters> measure <photon> energies, while tracking and muon systems identify charged leptons; narrow reconstructed peaks can be distinguished from smooth backgrounds with control samples and a likelihood analysis. The ATLAS discovery paper reported a new resonance near $126.5\,\mathrm{GeV}$. An observed <mass> peak supports the existence of a new state; production channels, decay rates and angular distributions test whether it has the particular Higgs couplings and quantum numbers.<Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC by ATLAS Collaboration>[abstract; Sections 2, 6–7 and 9]{ref}
Finally, the <hierarchy problem> asks why the electroweak scalar <mass> scale remains much smaller than a putative heavy physical scale without delicate cancellations. A cutoff estimate suggests corrections $\delta m_H^2\sim\Lambda^2/(16\pi^2)$ times couplings, but the quadratic cutoff term itself depends on the regularization convention. The physical concern persists when a heavy state of <mass> $M$ couples to the <Higgs field> and produces threshold corrections of order its coupling times $M^2/(16\pi^2)$. Matching a much smaller Higgs <mass> may then require cancellation between independent parameters. Supersymmetry, compositeness and other protective structures propose different resolutions; <renormalizability> of the <Standard Model> does not by itself resolve this sensitivity or establish that new particles must occur at one particular <mass>.
Back to article page
