= Solution
The supplied <adjacency matrix> describes a four-<vertex> <cycle graph>, with every <vertex degree> equal to two. <Degree-preserving edge rewiring> is random, so it does not determine one unique labelled output <adjacency matrix>. For example, replace <edges> $AB$ and $CD$ by $AC$ and $BD$, retaining $AD$ and $BC$. This valid switch gives, in order $A,B,C,D$,
$$
\boxed{A'=\begin{pmatrix}
0&0&1&1\\
0&0&1&1\\
1&1&0&0\\
1&1&0&0
\end{pmatrix}}.
$$
Each row still sums to two. Under the <simple graph> convention, all allowed outputs have the same unlabelled four-cycle topology: there are three possible labelled four-cycles. A rejected switch or later return can also leave the original <adjacency matrix>.
\b[It is not a <scale-free network>.] Its <degree distribution> is concentrated entirely at degree two, with no power-law tail; <degree-preserving edge rewiring> cannot change that.
Back to article page
