Solution (source code)

= Solution

For a starting price above the trigger, maximizing $V_L(S)$ amounts to maximizing $g(L)=(X-L)L^{-\beta_-}$ on $0<L<X$. Its derivative is
$$
g'(L)=L^{-\beta_--1}\bigl[(\beta_--1)L-\beta_-X\bigr].
$$
Because $\beta_-<0$, this is positive below $\beta_-X/(\beta_--1)$ and negative above it. Both endpoint limits of $g$ are zero. Thus the unique maximizing trigger is
$$
\boxed{S^*=\frac{\beta_-}{\beta_--1}X,\qquad 0<S^*<X.}
$$
Equivalently <smooth fit> requires $\beta_-(X-S^*)/S^*=-1$, matching the derivative of $X-S$ below the boundary. The optimized <perpetual put option> value is $X-S$ for $S\le S^*$ and $(X-S^*)(S/S^*)^{\beta_-}$ above it.

We can verify optimality among all stopping rules, not only constant triggers. The continuation branch is convex, with value and slope matching $X-S$ at $S^*$, so it dominates $X-S$ above the boundary; it is also positive, and hence dominates $(X-S)^+$ everywhere. Its discounted generator vanishes in continuation. In the exercise region, the generator of $X-S$ is $\delta S-rX$. The root equation gives
$$
\delta S^*/X=r+\tfrac12\sigma^2\beta_-<r,
$$
so for $\delta\ge0$ this generator is nonpositive throughout $S\le S^*$. <Smooth fit> eliminates a local-time contribution at the boundary. <Itô formula> and localization therefore make $e^{-rt}V(S_t)$ a nonnegative <supermartingale>, providing an upper bound for every discounted exercise payoff. The threshold strategy attains that bound by the <martingale> calculation in part (a). This proves the boundary is globally optimal.

The positive-interest assumption is substantive. If $r=0$ and $\delta\ge0$, the <stock> tends to zero almost surely, so the <supremum> of perpetual put payoffs has value $X$, approached by triggers $L\downarrow0$. No positive finite trigger attains that <supremum> for positive spot. The displayed finite-boundary formula belongs to the $r>0$ case. If $r<0$ and $\delta\ge0$, the <stock> still tends to zero, while the <discount factor> grows without bound. Even exercise at deterministic times tending to infinity makes the expected discounted put payoff unbounded, so there is no finite perpetual price in that extension.