= Solution
The motivation for <Kolmogorov refined similarity hypothesis> is <internal intermittency>: instantaneous energy dissipation is spatially uneven, so scaling every <velocity> increment by the global mean dissipation can mix regions of very different activity. Define the <coarse-grained energy dissipation> over a region of size $r$ by
$$
\epsilon_r(\boldsymbol x)=\frac1{|B_r|}\int_{B_r(\boldsymbol x)}2\nu S_{ij}(\boldsymbol y)S_{ij}(\boldsymbol y)d^3y.
$$
Its mean is $\epsilon$ in homogeneous turbulence. The refined hypothesis asserts that, at high local Reynolds number and within the <inertial range>, the normalized increment
$$
V_r=\frac{\Delta v}{(\epsilon_r r)^{1/3}}
$$
has universal conditional statistics independent of $\epsilon_r$ and of $r$. In particular, $\langle V_r^p\mid\epsilon_r\rangle=\beta_p$ for finite moments. Taking a conditional expectation and then averaging gives
$$
\boxed{\langle(\Delta v)^p\rangle
=\beta_pr^{p/3}\langle\epsilon_r^{p/3}\rangle.}
$$
Here $\epsilon_r$ is the paper's $\epsilon_{AV}(r)$. Signed odd moments need not have positive coefficients; the third-order forward-cascade coefficient is negative. The signed first moment is zero in homogeneous flow, so one does not assign it a nonzero scaling law. Absolute moments are often used when discussing general positive-order scaling exponents.
The refined hypothesis alone does not specify the distribution of $\epsilon_r$. Kolmogorov's 1962 estimate supplements it with a <lognormal intermittency model>. Let $Y_r=\ln(\epsilon_r/\epsilon)$ be Gaussian with <variance> $\sigma_r^2=\mu\ln(\ell/r)+\mathrm{constant}$. The condition $\langle\epsilon_r\rangle=\epsilon$ fixes its mean at $-\sigma_r^2/2$. The Gaussian exponential moment then gives, with $q=p/3$,
$$
\langle\epsilon_r^q\rangle=\epsilon^q
\exp\left(\frac{q(q-1)}2\sigma_r^2\right)
\propto\epsilon^q r^{-\mu q(q-1)/2}.
$$
Combining with the refined moment formula yields, for the nonzero moments described by that model,
$$
\boxed{\zeta_p=\frac p3-\frac\mu{18}p(p-3).}
$$
The intermittency parameter $\mu$ must be supplied by dissipation statistics; it is not determined by <dimensional analysis>. The formula preserves $\zeta_3=1$. Its extrapolation to arbitrarily high orders is not justified: the quadratic correction eventually predicts pathological exponents and is one limitation of the lognormal model, distinct from the refined hypothesis itself.
Back to article page
