= Solution
There are two different effect scales in this <zero-inflated Poisson regression>. The count component describes the mean $\mu$ conditional on belonging to the susceptible component, including its possible zero outcomes. Its <logarithmic link function> coefficients exponentiate to ratios of those conditional means. The zero component describes the structural-zero probability $\pi$; its logit coefficients exponentiate to <odds ratios>, not probability ratios.
Holding the other covariates fixed, Centre B versus Centre A changes the susceptible count mean by the factor
$$
\boxed{e^{0.434635}=1.5444,}
$$
an increase of about $54.4\%$. It simultaneously multiplies the odds of being a structural zero by
$$
\boxed{e^{0.6715}=1.9571.}
$$
Thus Centre B is associated both with higher count intensity among susceptible patients and with greater odds of belonging to the never-at-risk class.
Use no personality disorder as the reference. For women, borderline disorder multiplies the susceptible count mean by $e^{-0.224673}=0.7988$, and other disorder multiplies it by $e^{-1.564576}=0.2092$. Because the count model has sex-by-disorder <interaction terms>, the corresponding male comparisons must add the interactions before exponentiating:
$$
\boxed{\begin{aligned}
RR_{\rm borderline,male}&=e^{-0.224673-0.240213}\approx0.6282,\\
RR_{\rm other,male}&=e^{-1.564576+1.462261}\approx0.9027.
\end{aligned}}
$$
These compare men with the stated disorder to otherwise comparable men without a disorder; the female comparisons use female reference patients. The interaction multipliers $0.7865$ and $4.3157$ alone are ratios of these sex-specific disorder ratios, not the overall male disorder effects.
In the zero component there is no sex-by-disorder interaction. Borderline and other disorders multiply the structural-zero odds relative to no disorder by \b[$0.4217$ and $0.5504$], respectively, holding centre fixed; these comparisons are the same for both sexes in the fitted zero model.
The marginal mean is $E(Y)=(1-\pi)\mu$. Therefore none of these count multipliers alone is the population-average change in expected episodes when the same covariate also changes $\pi$. For a count coefficient change $b$ and zero-logit change $g$ from baseline zero predictor $\eta$, the marginal mean ratio is
$$
\boxed{RR_{\rm marginal}=e^b\frac{1+e^{\eta}}{1+e^{\eta+g}}.}
$$
For centre use $(b,g)=(0.434635,0.6715)$; for disorder use its sex-specific count contrast and its zero contrast. This is the <component and marginal effects in zero-inflated regression> distinction needed to interpret these results carefully.
Back to article page
