= Solution
Take $h$ positive downwards and write $B$ for the <filament bending modulus>. Under the material-modulus interpretation of the printed $A$ as <Young's modulus>, the circular cross-section gives the <second moment of area> and bending modulus
$$
I=\int_{\rm section}y^2\,dS=\frac{\pi a^4}{4},\qquad B=AI=\frac{A\pi a^4}{4}.
$$
Indeed a small <curvature> $\kappa$ gives axial <strain> $-y\kappa$, so integrating $A y^2\kappa^2/2$ over the section gives bending <energy> $B\kappa^2/2$ per unit length. Keeping this distinction is essential to the powers of radius in the answer.
After allowing for <buoyancy>, the effective downward <force> per unit length is
$$
w=(\rho_f-\rho)\pi a^2g>0.
$$
The filament loses <potential energy> as it moves down; the displaced fluid's hydrostatic contribution is included through the density difference. For an <inextensible filament> with arc-length coordinate $s$, the geometric bending and gravitational <energy> is $\int_0^L[B\kappa(s)^2/2-wh(s)]ds$, up to a constant. For the small-slope <Monge representation> this reduces to
$$
\boxed{E[h]=\int_0^L\left[\frac{B}{2}(h_{xx})^2-wh\right]dx,
\qquad B=\frac{A\pi a^4}{4},\quad w=(\rho_f-\rho)\pi a^2g.}
$$
The upward-positive convention reverses the sign of $h$ and the gravitational term together. There is no stretching contribution at this order when bending a slender filament without imposed axial tension. The wording does not explicitly distinguish a material elastic modulus from a flexural modulus: if $A$ instead denotes the <filament bending modulus> in the intended convention, set $B=A$ throughout; then the $\pi a^4/4$ factor is already included in $A$.
Back to article page
