= Solution
\b[Measure pit dimensions from calibrated height data after background correction, with an explicit pit-boundary convention.] Preserve the raw image, lateral calibration and acquisition settings. Level the surrounding terraces and correct line offsets with the pits excluded from the fit; otherwise the deep features bias the background.
Segment each depression relative to its local surface, for example by a reproducible height threshold or a fitted rim. Inspect segmentation overlaid on the image. For noncircular pits, report a metric such as equivalent-area diameter
$$
\boxed{d_{\rm eq}=2\sqrt{A_{\rm pit}/\pi},}
$$
or maximum and minimum caliper diameters, rather than pretending every pit has a circular rim. Apply the same definition to all objects and exclude overlapping or edge-truncated pits where appropriate.
The visible $250\,\mathrm{nm}$ scale bar can calibrate a rendered image approximately, while the original pixel-spacing metadata is preferable. The $8\,\mathrm{nm}$ vertical scale is not a lateral calibration. Estimate uncertainty from pixels, threshold choice, background fits and repeated scans. The tip may be unable to enter narrow pits, so measured depths and diameters require a <tip convolution> assessment or a sharper calibrated probe. Finally classify populations only against independently validated size/type evidence; the image alone does not establish a universal diameter cutoff for edge, screw and mixed dislocations.
Back to article page
