= Solution
First, use a <phase-shift mask>: neighbouring openings transmit appropriately phased light, increasing the intensity slope and improving separation of neighbouring bright regions. The benefit is pattern dependent and phase conflicts or mask defects must be controlled. Second, use <off-axis illumination> matched to the grating orientation, so useful diffracted orders fall inside the projection pupil and contribute interference contrast at smaller pitch. Check orientation dependence and the reduced process window; it does not enlarge the geometrical pupil.
Third, use <optical proximity correction> and subresolution assist features to compensate the pattern-dependent aerial-image distortion at edges and corners. Verify the printed critical dimensions using a focus–exposure matrix and <scanning electron microscopy>. These are three adaptations of the existing exposure process that lower effective $k_1$; none promises arbitrary subwavelength structure. A thinner, higher-contrast <photoresist> and an antireflection underlayer can further improve pattern transfer, but do not change the wavelength.
Back to article page
