= Solution
The upper island has lower contrast than the rod in <HAADF imaging>, consistent with a lighter Zn-containing region above a Ru-rich support. Thickness, orientation and detector conditions also affect contrast, so intensity alone is not a compositional assay. The island is a flattened supported cap, not an isolated regular bulk crystal.
Using the 2 nm scale bar as a ruler gives a \b[projected lateral size of order 4–6 nm and height of order 1–2 nm], depending on placement of the diffuse edges. These are approximate image estimates, not a three-dimensional diameter or size distribution. The height/width ratio is roughly $0.2$–$0.5$, and only a few atomic rows span the height. Thus surface and interface atoms form a substantial fraction of the particle. The truncated, irregular cap and weak edge order depart from an infinite, fully coordinated, perfectly periodic <wurtzite> crystal.
Adhesion can favor spreading across the rod. <epitaxy> can orient ZnO against a compatible surface repeat of the <rutile structure>, despite the different bulk symmetries. Coherent growth initially introduces strain; free edges allow relaxation, while larger islands may develop <misfit dislocations>. Facet-dependent attachment, polar surface energies, ligand coverage and unequal precursor delivery can further alter the cap. A final image does not uniquely reveal which kinetic pathway operated.
To measure strain, first index the <zone axis> and projected lattices. For pixel spacing $s$ and scale-bar length $s_{\rm bar}$, $d_{\rm image}=2s/s_{\rm bar}\ {\rm nm}$. Compare an indexed spacing with its unstrained reference:
$$
\epsilon_{hkl}=\frac{d_{\rm image}-d^0_{hkl}}{d^0_{hkl}},\qquad
\frac1{(d^0_{hkl})^2}=
\frac{4(h^2+hk+k^2)}{3a^2}+\frac{l^2}{c^2}.
$$
The latter is the hexagonal <wurtzite> relation. An ideal tetrahedral geometry has $c/a=\sqrt{8/3}$ and internal coordinate $u=3/8$; real bulk ZnO itself need not attain those ideal values. Measure several periods and compare interface and free-edge regions to distinguish strain from tilt and calibration errors.
\b[A unique numerical lattice strain, vacancy concentration or phase assignment is not established by this unindexed single projection.] Oxygen columns are weak, so a missing bright spot does not prove an oxygen vacancy. Tilted images, <electron diffraction>, chemical mapping and thickness-aware simulations would test those claims. The full <rutile structure> is primitive tetragonal with a basis: its metal positions can appear body-centered in a conventional cell, but the oxygen basis prevents calling the entire structure a body-centered tetragonal Bravais lattice.
Back to article page
