= Solution
In <high-angle annular dark-field imaging> <scanning transmission electron microscopy>, <electrons> scattered to large angles give predominantly incoherent mass–thickness and atomic-number contrast. For comparable thickness, \b[<gold> is much brighter than <nickel>–<phosphorus>] because its <atomic number> is much larger. <carbon> in the protective cap scatters weakly, whereas its <tungsten> component scatters strongly. The cap is not a homogeneous low-atomic-number reference.
The <gold> layer follows a curved, locally distorted interface. The dark central opening in the overview is consistent with a crack, void or locally missing/thinned foil: little material along the beam path gives little high-angle scattering. The granular and columnar variations beneath the <gold> indicate nanoscale heterogeneity in the affected NiP$_y$ region. Differences in thickness, density, <porosity> and composition can all contribute; <diffraction>/channeling effects are reduced in <high-angle annular dark-field imaging> but not eliminated in every geometry.
A black region is therefore evidence of low projected scattering mass, not by itself the identity of a chemical phase. In particular, a single <high-angle annular dark-field imaging> image does not distinguish a pre-existing void from material lost during specimen preparation.
Back to article page
