= Solution
The thin <scanning transmission electron microscopy> foil restricts scattering to a much smaller projected specimen volume than bulk <SEM> at $30\,\mathrm{kV}$. It reveals \b[the nanoscale shape and continuity of the <gold>/NiP interface, the narrow low-density opening and the fine heterogeneous region underneath the <gold>], which the larger <SEM> interaction volume and surface-sensitive collection obscure.
The enlarged view resolves structure on the tens-of-nanometres scale: local interface roughness, small bright and dark domains and the relationship of the <gold> layer to the damaged or porous-looking NiP$_y$ region. This helps distinguish an interface-associated defect from merely a change between nominal alloy layers. It still does not identify a crystalline phase or quantify composition without <diffraction> or spectroscopic analysis. Since the <SEM> surface and <focused ion beam milling> lamella need not cut precisely the same volume, correlations should allow for section position.
Back to article page
