= Solution
\b[For a purely <electromagnetic interaction> continuum with five active <quark flavors>, the usual estimate is $N_{e^+e^-}/N_{\rm had}=3/11$.] The unspecified <particle resonance> and the word “total” require qualifications before this can be treated as a unique physical prediction.
In <natural units>, neglecting final <masses>, single-<photon> annihilation gives
$$
\sigma(\mu^+\mu^-\to e^+e^-)=\frac{4\pi\alpha^2}{3s},\qquad
\sigma(\mu^+\mu^-\to q_f\bar q_f)=3Q_f^2\frac{4\pi\alpha^2}{3s}.
$$
Here $\alpha$ is the <fine-structure constant>, $Q_f$ the <quark> <electric charge> in elementary-charge units, and the factor three counts orthogonal colour final states. Consequently the inverse <hadronic R ratio> is
$$
\boxed{\frac{N_{e^+e^-}}{N_{\rm had}}=\frac1{3\sum_{f\ {\rm active}}Q_f^2}.}
$$
With $u,d,s,c,b$ accessible, the denominator is $3[2(2/3)^2+3(1/3)^2]=11/3$. The corresponding values for $u,d,s$ and $u,d,s,c$ are $1/2$ and $3/10$. Inclusive <Quantum chromodynamics> corrections increase the hadronic denominator, approximately by $1+\alpha_s/\pi$ away from thresholds and <particle resonances>. These are annihilation ratios before selection and <detection efficiency> corrections, not ratios of uncorrected detector counts.
A future <muon-collider Higgs resonance> is a plausible reading of part (c), since its narrow <decay width> makes a detuning of a few $\mathrm{MeV}$ relevant. Even then, two further assumptions are necessary. First, being a few $\mathrm{MeV}$ below the <Higgs boson> peak does not eliminate it: for detuning $\Delta=\sqrt{s}-m_H$, the ideal narrow <Breit-Wigner resonance cross section> retains the relative factor
$$
\frac{\sigma_H(\Delta)}{\sigma_H(0)}\simeq
\frac{\Gamma_H^2}{4\Delta^2+\Gamma_H^2}.
$$
For $\Gamma_H=4\,\mathrm{MeV}$ and $\Delta=-4\,\mathrm{MeV}$ this is $1/5$, not zero. Resonant hadronic production can still change the requested denominator substantially.
Second, at $\sqrt{s}\simeq125\,\mathrm{GeV}$ the <Z boson> continuum is not negligible. A more complete annihilation estimate including both <tree-level Feynman diagrams> uses
$$
\sigma_f=\frac{4\pi\alpha^2}{3s}N_c^fF_f(s),\qquad
F_f=Q_f^2-2Q_fv_\mu v_f\operatorname{Re}\chi
+(v_\mu^2+a_\mu^2)(v_f^2+a_f^2)|\chi|^2,
$$
$$
v_f=T_3^f-2Q_fs_W^2,\quad a_f=T_3^f,\quad
\chi=\frac{s}{4s_W^2(1-s_W^2)(s-m_Z^2+i m_Z\Gamma_Z)}.
$$
Here $s_W^2$ is the squared sine of the <weak mixing angle>, $T_3^f$ is <weak isospin>, and $N_c^f$ is one for a <lepton> and three for a <quark>. Thus the continuum ratio is $F_e/[3(2F_u+3F_d)]$, rather than necessarily $3/11$. For example, $s_W^2=0.231$, $m_Z=91.1876\,\mathrm{GeV}$ and $\Gamma_Z=2.4952\,\mathrm{GeV}$ give approximately $0.102$ at $125\,\mathrm{GeV}$ before <Quantum chromodynamics> corrections.
If the unspecified <particle resonance> instead means the <Z boson>, detuning by a few $\mathrm{MeV}$ is tiny compared with its $2.5\,\mathrm{GeV}$ <decay width>. The resonant ratio remains approximately $\Gamma(Z\to e^+e^-)/\Gamma(Z\to\mathrm{hadrons})=1/20.767\simeq0.0482$.<Review of Particle Physics by Particle Data Group (2021)>[Z listing, p. 9: hadronic-to-single-lepton partial-width ratio $20.767\pm0.025$]{ref} This is a concrete counterexample to treating any slight downward detuning as permission to discard the <particle resonance>. The source supplies neither its identity nor the detuning and selection needed for a unique all-process ratio. The boxed continuum formula is the charge-counting answer under its stated approximation; a literal total must also include remaining resonant and other accepted hadronic channels.
Back to article page
