Solution (source code)

= Solution

For a lattice-periodic potential, <Bloch's theorem> permits energy eigenfunctions $\psi_{\mathbf k}(\mathbf r)=e^{i\mathbf k\cdot\mathbf r}u_{\mathbf k}(\mathbf r)$, where $u_{\mathbf k}(\mathbf r+\mathbf R)=u_{\mathbf k}(\mathbf r)$ for every lattice translation $\mathbf R$. The <crystal momentum> is $\hbar\mathbf k$, defined modulo a <reciprocal lattice> vector. A reciprocal vector $\mathbf G$ satisfies $\mathbf G\cdot\mathbf R\in2\pi\mathbb Z$, so $e^{i\mathbf G\cdot\mathbf r}$ is lattice-periodic.

Expand the <Bloch wave> as plane waves in one momentum class, $\psi=\sum_{\mathbf q}c_{\mathbf q}e^{i\mathbf q\cdot\mathbf r}$ with $\mathbf q=\mathbf k+\mathbf G'$. Substitution into the <Schrödinger equation>, using $U=\sum_{\mathbf G}U_{\mathbf G}e^{i\mathbf G\cdot\mathbf r}$, gives a kinetic coefficient $\hbar^2q^2c_{\mathbf q}/(2m)$ and potential coefficient $\sum_{\mathbf G}U_{\mathbf G}c_{\mathbf q-\mathbf G}$. Independence of the plane waves therefore gives
$$
\boxed{\left(\frac{\hbar^2q^2}{2m}-E\right)c_{\mathbf q}+\sum_{\mathbf G}U_{\mathbf G}c_{\mathbf q-\mathbf G}=0.}
$$
This uses $\mathbf q$ for the paper's running plane-wave index, to distinguish it from the fixed reduced Bloch wavevector.

For $G=2\pi/a$, the sine potential has coefficients $U_G=-iV$, $U_{-G}=iV$. At the <Brillouin zone> boundary, the free states $e^{i\pi x/a}$ and $e^{-i\pi x/a}$ are degenerate. Keeping these two resonant waves in the <nearly-free electron model> gives
$$
\begin{pmatrix}\beta-E&-iV\\iV&\beta-E\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}c_+\\c_-\end{pmatrix}=0,\qquad\boxed{\beta=\frac{\hbar^2\pi^2}{2ma^2}.}
$$
The determinant is $(\beta-E)^2-V^2$, so \b[the two energies are $E_\pm=\beta\pm|V|$], separated by $2|V|$. With $V>0$, the lower combination has coefficients $(1,-i)/\sqrt2$ and density proportional to $1-\sin Gx$; the upper has $(1,i)/\sqrt2$ and density $1+\sin Gx$. The lower wave places less weight where the potential is positive. Coupling to nonresonant plane waves gives higher-order corrections beyond this two-wave approximation.

The first <Brillouin zone> of a <primitive cubic lattice> is the cube $|k_i|\leq\pi/a$. Its boundary along $(100)$ is the face center $(\pi/a,0,0)$, while along $(111)$ it is the corner $(\pi/a,\pi/a,\pi/a)$. Therefore
$$
\boxed{E_{100}^{(0)}=\beta,\qquad E_{111}^{(0)}=3\beta.}
$$
A spin-degenerate band accommodates two electrons per cell. To be a <band insulator>, the filled first band must be separated from the second at every wavevector; a direct local splitting alone is insufficient. Under the paper's uniform-boundary-gap estimate, take the lower edge as $E^{(0)}-V$ and the upper edge as $E^{(0)}+V$. The highest lower edge is $3\beta-V$ and the lowest upper edge is $\beta+V$. Thus the <indirect gap in a uniformly split zone-boundary model> is
$$
E_g^{\rm ind}=(\beta+V)-(3\beta-V)=2(V-\beta),\qquad\boxed{V>\frac{\hbar^2\pi^2}{2ma^2}.}
$$
Equality gives touching rather than a positive gap; for smaller $V$, <overlapping energy bands prevent a band insulator>. This final threshold is the stated uniform-splitting band-edge estimate. A quantitative three-dimensional potential mixes several plane waves at corners and requires its full band structure rather than assuming the two-wave sine calculation remains exact there.