= Solution
The <plasma parameter> is the mean number of <electrons> in a <Debye sphere>. With <electron> <Debye length> $\lambda_D=(\varepsilon_0k_BT/n_ee^2)^{1/2}$,
$$
\boxed{N_D=\frac{4\pi}{3}n_e\lambda_D^3.}
$$
Large $N_D$ describes weakly coupled collective screening; a single <electron> does not dominate its screening cloud. For a small uniform <electron> displacement $\xi$ relative to fixed <ions>, the restoring field gives $m_e\ddot\xi=-n_ee^2\xi/\varepsilon_0$, hence
$$
\boxed{\omega_p^2=\frac{n_ee^2}{\varepsilon_0m_e}.}
$$
This cold-electron <oscillation> estimate neglects thermal dispersion and <ion> motion.
Using the stipulated collision-time approximation,
$$
\tau\simeq\frac{N_D}{Z\omega_p}
=\frac{4\pi\varepsilon_0^2(k_BT)^{3/2}}{3Zn_ee^4\sqrt{m_e}}.
$$
With $C\sim3n_ek_B/2$ and $v^2\sim k_BT/m_e$, the kinetic estimate $K=Cv^2\tau/3$ gives
$$
\boxed{K=\frac{B}{Z\sqrt{m_e}}\frac{2\pi k_B\varepsilon_0^2}{3e^4}(k_BT)^{5/2}.}
$$
The elementary single-speed estimate corresponds to $B=1$; <velocity> averaging and the stated collision model are represented by the supplied $B$. A detailed Coulomb transport calculation also contains a <Coulomb logarithm> and cannot be inferred precisely from this simplified expression.
The <electron> thermal <energy> <density> is $3n_ek_BT/2$. Transporting all of it at the thermal <speed> gives the free-streaming scale
$$
\boxed{\dot q_{\max}=\frac{3n_ek_BT}{2}\sqrt{\frac{k_BT}{m_e}}.}
$$
For <heat> flowing in the positive $x$ direction, $-dT/dx>0$. Inserting $K$ into $K(-dT/dx)>A\dot q_{\max}$ gives
$$
\boxed{-\frac{dT}{dx}>
\frac{9AZ}{4\pi Bk_BT}\frac{n_ee^4}{k_B\varepsilon_0^2}.}
$$
This flux-limiting criterion expresses the failure of a local diffusive description when an <electron> samples a substantial change in <temperature> over a transport path.
For the stipulated carbon <plasma> and $B\simeq10$, setting the gradient equal to $10^{11}\,\mathrm{K\,m^{-1}}$ gives a critical flux fraction of order $A_{\rm crit}\simeq0.05$. Fourier transport is invalid according to this test when $\boxed{A<A_{\rm crit}}$; a still larger actual gradient raises the critical value. Thus the source's request for a \b[minimum] $A$ has the inequality reversed: the calculation gives an upper threshold, not a positive minimum. An arbitrarily smaller positive $A$ makes the criterion easier to satisfy. The exact numerical threshold is evaluated in the independent check.
Back to article page
