= Solution
The <Second law of thermodynamics> states that total <entropy> of an isolated composite system cannot decrease. For a cyclic <heat engine> exchanging heat only with reservoirs at $T_h>T_c>0$, it gives $-Q_h/T_h+Q_c/T_c\ge0$. Since $W=Q_h-Q_c$,
$$
\boxed{\eta=\frac W{Q_h}\le1-\frac{T_c}{T_h}=\eta_{\max}.}
$$
The bound is attained by a reversible <heat engine>: no friction, no finite-temperature-difference heat exchange and no other <entropy production>. A <Carnot cycle> provides an implementation with two reversible isotherms and two reversible adiabats. All <temperatures> in these ratios are absolute.
Let $n_{\rm mol}$ be the fixed gas amount, $r=V_2/V_1>1$, $\Delta T=T_h-T_c$, and let $C_V$ denote the heat capacity of the whole sample. First take the <unregenerated Stirling cycle>, so that heat rejected during isochoric cooling is not stored and returned during isochoric heating. The reversible quasistatic gas work is
$$
W_{12}=n_{\rm mol}RT_h\ln r,\quad W_{23}=0,\quad
W_{34}=-n_{\rm mol}RT_c\ln r,\quad W_{41}=0,
$$
while the heat inputs are $Q_{12}=n_{\rm mol}RT_h\ln r$ and $Q_{41}=C_V\Delta T$. Hence
$$
\boxed{W=n_{\rm mol}R\Delta T\ln r,\qquad
\eta=\frac{n_{\rm mol}R\Delta T\ln r}{n_{\rm mol}RT_h\ln r+C_V\Delta T}<1-\frac{T_c}{T_h}.}
$$
The strict inequality follows because $C_V\Delta T>0$ adds heat input without additional work. Quasistatic motion alone does not make heat exchange with a single hot or cold reservoir reversible while the gas temperature changes on an isochore. Indeed, using those two reservoirs gives total external <entropy production> $C_V\Delta T(1/T_c-1/T_h)>0$ per cycle.
The strict comparison requires the no-regeneration assumption. A perfect reversible regenerator stores $C_V\Delta T$ during $2\to3$ and returns it during $4\to1$; only the isothermal heat transfers then enter the external heat budget, giving $\eta=1-T_c/T_h$ exactly. For example, perfect regeneration with $T_h=600\,\mathrm K$, $T_c=300\,\mathrm K$ and $r=2$ gives $\eta=1/2=\eta_{\max}$. Thus the four gas paths by themselves do not enforce an efficiency strictly below the Carnot bound.
For the gas itself, the four <entropy> changes are
$$
\boxed{\Delta S_{12}=n_{\rm mol}R\ln r,\quad
\Delta S_{23}=C_V\ln\frac{T_c}{T_h},\quad
\Delta S_{34}=-n_{\rm mol}R\ln r,\quad
\Delta S_{41}=C_V\ln\frac{T_h}{T_c}.}
$$
Expansion increases the available positional states; compression reverses that change. Isochoric cooling reduces thermal populations and isochoric heating restores them. The sum is zero because <entropy> is a <state function>. This does not imply zero total <entropy production> in the gas plus external reservoirs.
Taking $S_1$ as reference, the isotherms are horizontal on a $T$–$S$ diagram. The isochore through state 1 obeys $S-S_1=C_V\ln(T/T_h)$, and the isochore through state 2 is shifted right by $n_{\rm mol}R\ln r$. For the internally reversible quasistatic gas paths, $\delta Q=T\,dS$, so
$$
\boxed{\oint T\,dS=Q_{\rm net}=W.}
$$
The enclosed area is the net work per engine cycle, with a clockwise orientation. It is not the total heat input.
\Image[/past-exam-of-the-thermal-physics-course-of-the-university-of-oxford/2016-stirling-entropy-and-refrigerator-bound.png]
{title=Stirling entropy cycle and the refrigerator's performance bound}
{description=Original illustrative gas cycle with constant heat capacity, together with the predicted <coefficient of performance> of an unregenerated neon refrigerator. The stated performance lies above the reversible bound; no volume ratio can repair that conflict.}
For the refrigerator, the stated rates give the cooling <coefficient of performance> $\mathcal C=\dot Q_c/P=1.9/0.1=19$. But the absolute reservoir temperatures are $T_c=277.15\,\mathrm K$ and $T_h=293.15\,\mathrm K$, so <Carnot's theorem> requires
$$
\boxed{\mathcal C\le\frac{T_c}{T_h-T_c}=17.3219.}
$$
At $0.1\,\mathrm{kW}$ input the largest allowed cooling rate is only $1.7322\,\mathrm{kW}$. Equivalently the stated $2.0\,\mathrm{kW}$ heat rejection gives the reservoir entropy rate
$$
\frac{2.0\,\mathrm{kW}}{293.15\,\mathrm K}-\frac{1.9\,\mathrm{kW}}{277.15\,\mathrm K}
=-0.03305\,\mathrm{W\,K^{-1}}<0,
$$
a direct violation of the <Second law of thermodynamics> for this cyclic two-reservoir device.
The unregenerated neon model makes the algebraic obstruction explicit. With $C_V/(n_{\rm mol}R)=3/2$, reversing the cycle gives
$$
\mathcal C=\frac{n_{\rm mol}RT_c\ln r-C_V\Delta T}{n_{\rm mol}R\Delta T\ln r}
=\frac{T_c}{\Delta T}-\frac{3}{2\ln r}.
$$
Setting this to 19 produces $\ln r=-0.89385$, or $r=0.4091$, contradicting the required expansion ratio $r>1$. Perfect regeneration can raise performance only to the Carnot bound and does not fix the problem. \b[There is no physically admissible $V_2/V_1$ for the stated data.]
Back to article page
