= Solution
The <continuous nonalgebraic unit interval> is
$$
\boxed{P=[0,1]\text{ with its usual order}.}
$$
Every nonempty <directed set> has a <least upper bound> by completeness of the real numbers, and that <least upper bound> lies in $[0,1]$. Thus this is a <directed-complete partial order>.
For $0\leq a<b\leq1$, we have $a\ll b$. Indeed, if $b\leq\sup D$ and no $d\in D$ were at least $a$, then $a$ would be an <upper bound> for $D$, implying $\sup D\leq a<b$, a contradiction. If $a>b$, the singleton <directed set> $\{b\}$ excludes $a\ll b$. If $a=b>0$, the increasing <sequence> $d_n=b(1-1/n)$, $n\geq1$, has <least upper bound> $b$ and has no member at least $b$, so $b\not\ll b$.
Under the usual nonempty convention, $0\ll0$. Therefore the elements <way-below> $b>0$ form $[0,b)$, and those <way-below> $0$ form $\{0\}$. These are <directed sets> with <least upper bounds> $b$ and $0$, respectively, proving that $[0,1]$ is a <continuous directed-complete partial order>. Its only <compact element> is $0$. For any $b>0$, the <compact elements> below $b$ have <least upper bound> $0$, rather than $b$, so it is not an <algebraic partially ordered set>.
Under the literal empty-set convention of the paper, $0\not\ll0$ as well. The elements <way-below> zero then form the empty <set>, which is directed in that convention and has <least upper bound> zero. There are no <compact elements>, and their empty <set> still fails to approximate any positive $b$. Thus both conventions give the same requested classification:
$$
\boxed{[0,1]\text{ is continuous but not algebraic}.}
$$
Back to article page
