By part ii every subset of the Baire space of sequences is -Suslin. If , part i would make every such set -Suslin. Therefore
Now suppose . The axiom of choice gives a set of cardinality exactly . If were -Suslin, the Aleph-one-Suslin decomposition into analytic sets would write it as a union of analytic sets. If all those analytic sets were countable, their union would have cardinality at most , so one of them is uncountable. The perfect set property for analytic sets then makes that member, and hence , have cardinality , contradicting
Thus is not -Suslin, and
An inner model is projectively well-ordered when some projective relation well-orders the real numbers of . The ordinal is the least ordinal that regards as uncountable; equivalently, it is the supremum of the order types of the well-order codes in .
Assume for contradiction that is uncountable in the ambient universe. Use the projective well-order of the reals of to choose, for each , the least -real coding a well-order of type . Standard closure properties of the projective hierarchy make the resulting set projective. It is uncountable because it contains one distinct code for every .
The set has no perfect subset. Indeed, a perfect subset is closed and therefore analytic. The boundedness theorem for well-order codes bounds the ranks of its members below one countable ordinal . Since contains at most one code of each rank, would then be countable, whereas every nonempty perfect set of reals is uncountable.
If every projective set is determined, projective determinacy holds and gives the perfect set property to every projective set. Applying it to the uncountable projective set yields a perfect subset, a contradiction. Therefore
This is projective determinacy collapses the inner-model omega-one.
If is projectively well-ordered and projective determinacy holds, then is countable in the ambient universe. Otherwise, selecting with the projective well-order the least -code for each countable ordinal produces an uncountable projective set of unique well-order codes. It has no perfect subset by the boundedness theorem for well-order codes, contradicting the perfect set property implied by projective determinacy.