A smooth projective curve generates by its point differences if and only if it meets every prime Weil divisor. If a prime Weil divisor avoids , its restriction to has degree zero; constancy of line bundle degree in a family shows that every translate either contains or misses it. This forces invariance under and puts the generated subgroup inside the line bundle translation stabilizer. If this subgroup were all of , the divisor would be algebraically trivial, contradicting its positive intersection with an ample line bundle. Conversely a proper closed generated subgroup admits a disjoint divisor by the pole divisor avoiding a fiber construction, after translating the fiber to contain .
For the curve generation criterion for an abelian variety, first suppose and an irreducible Weil divisor avoids . The preceding part gives , so and . A nonzero effective divisor cannot have this property: if is an ample line bundle and , then the intersection product of Cartier divisors is positive, whereas an algebraically trivial line bundle has zero intersection with every curve. The latter follows from constancy of degree along a connected family defining algebraic equivalence; the former is the positive projective degree of after replacing by a very ample power. This contradiction proves that meets every irreducible Weil divisor.
Conversely suppose . Fix , so . Use the permitted fiber theorem to choose a morphism of varieties with . This morphism is nonconstant because is proper. Choose an affine neighborhood of . The irreducible image has positive dimension, so its intersection with does too; some regular function on is nonconstant on this intersection. Then is a nonconstant rational function on , regular on .
The pole divisor avoiding a fiber construction applies: its pole Weil divisor is nonzero. Indeed on the smooth, hence normal, projective variety , a rational function with no codimension-one poles extends to a global regular function; every global regular function on a connected projective variety is constant. Every pole component lies outside and hence avoids . Therefore is an irreducible Weil divisor disjoint from , and in particular from . This proves the converse using precisely the fiber fact allowed in the question, without requiring a projective target . The criterion is