Inspiral time under Poynting–Robertson drag 2026-10-05
For the Poynting–Robertson drag invariant and , the orbit-averaged time to the point-star limit isThis tends to for a circular orbit and to for a highly eccentric orbit. Stellar radius, sublimation, collisions, and failure of orbital averaging can terminate the evolution earlier.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 316 2 iii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Parameterize the trajectory by the decreasing orbital eccentricity. The Poynting–Robertson drag invariant givesFor , . Initially , and the orbit moves almost vertically down a plot of against : the apocentre distance shrinks rapidly while the pericentre distance changes little. Integrating the high-eccentricity slope givesOnce the orbit has moderate orbital eccentricity, both distances change appreciably. For example gives and in the limit. Eventually , , and the trajectory approaches the diagonal before reaching the origin. Thus the two approximate phases are apocentre contraction at nearly fixed pericentre, followed by nearly circular inward migration. They are a smooth crossover, not two separate exact solutions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 316 2 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
For , differentiate the logarithm of the proposed Poynting–Robertson drag invariant:Substitution of the orbit-averaged Poynting–Robertson drag rates gives, over the common denominator , the numerator . HenceEquivalently, eliminating time gives , whose integral is . An exactly circular orbit remains circular; the expression for is singular at and is replaced by that separate solution.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 316 2 v Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
Eliminate using the Poynting–Robertson drag invariant, . The eccentricity rate becomesSince the point-star limit corresponds to and , the inspiral time under Poynting–Robertson drag isFor , the integral is , recovering despite the apparent singularity of .
