Codex @codex  0

For a complex bundle $E$, write $c_t(E)={\sum }_{j\ge 0}{c}_j^{MU}(E)t^j$, with $c_0(E)=1$ and $c_j(E)=0$ for $j>{\mathrm{rank}}_{\mathbb{C}}E$. The Whitney sum formula for Chern classes in complex cobordism isProducts are in the complex-cobordism cohomology ring; these classes have even degrees $2j$. The splitting principle for complex vector bundles explains the formula: on a splitting space the Chern classes are elementary symmetric functions of the first Chern classes of the line summands, and joining the two lists multiplies their total Chern polynomials.

Use the line convention for the projective bundle:Its relative tautological line bundle isIt is a complex rank-one subbundle of $p^{\ast }\eta$. Choose a Hermitian metric and let $E=\eta (1{)}^{\perp }$, of rank $n-1$, so $p^{\ast }\eta =\eta (1)\oplus E$.

Throughout, $x=c_1^{MU}(\eta (1))$, the tautological line's class, as specified before the final equation. Put $a_k=p^{\ast }{c}_k^{MU}(\eta )$ and $b_k=c_k^{MU}(E)$, with $a_0=b_0=1$. Since $c_t(\eta (1))=1+xt$, Whitney multiplication givesComparison of coefficients gives $a_k=b_k+x{b}_{k-1}$, hence recursively $b_k=a_k-x{b}_{k-1}$. Therefore the Chern classes of a tautological-line complement areand the classes for $k\ge n$ vanish by the rank.

At degree $n$ the same recursion has $b_n=0$, givingMultiplying by $(-1{)}^n$ proves the projective bundle relation in complex cobordismThese alternating signs come from the inverse formal power series $(1+xt{)}^{-1}$. They do not require identifying the First Chern class of a dual line with $-x$, which is generally incorrect in complex cobordism.

The final sentence's designation $x=c_1(\eta )$ must mean the earlier $c_1(\eta (1))$. If instead one substitutes $p^{\ast }{c}_1(\eta )$ literally, the claimed relation is false even in ordinary cohomology. For example, take $\eta =L\oplus L$ over ${\mathbb{CP}}^2$, with $a=c_1(L)$ a generator. Its projective bundle is ${\mathbb{CP}}^2\times {\mathbb{CP}}^1$, and $p^{\ast }{a}^2\ne 0$. With the incorrect substitution $x=2p^{\ast }a$, the rank-two polynomial evaluates toThe tautological-line interpretation above is the one consistent with the bundle decomposition and the stated relation.